From AJDGOMEZ at telefonica.net Mon Nov 1 04:31:43 2004 From: AJDGOMEZ at telefonica.net (AJDGOMEZ@telefonica.net) Date: Mon Nov 1 04:30:51 2004 Subject: [Eac-l] Re: EAC DTD error Message-ID: Barbara, Daniel, I think I understand both arguments, and, in my opinion, some day EAC will have to face this refinement (names/entities). However, from my point of view, at the moment the DTD is ok, as a beta version, and further refinements before testing it would generate confusion. Regards Alejandro Delgado-G?mez City Council of Cartagena 3000 Informatics ----- Mensaje Original ----- De: Daniel Pitti Fecha: Viernes, Octubre 29, 2004 5:24 pm Asunto: [Eac-l] Re: EAC DTD error > Barbara, > > I am just about to rush off to a meeting which will occupy me for > most of > the afternoon. The distinction you make about names vs entity > brings back > my library authority work. This well may be a point of divergence > between > library authority control and archival authority control, that is, > whether > it is about the name or the entity (or perhaps entities) bearing > the name > (or same names). I'll wait to hear more from the archivists before > venturing much further out on the limb. > > Daniel > > At 11:02 AM 10/29/2004, you wrote: > >I cannot quite follow what the issue is here as my version of the DTD > >and Tag Library information both show "corpname", etc. Can you > tell me > >where in the DTD and the Tag Library you are trying to make this > >correction? I can't find it. > > > >I'm also not clear about what you are asking. As you know, in > >authority records or packages of authoritative information about an > >identity (EAC recognizes identities) the focus is on the names to be > >used to represent that entity (the identity) - and those in turn > can be > >associated with one or more actual persons (or corporate bodies, or > >families). An entity of "person", "corporate body", or "family" can > >certainly exist, but in the EAC context, the EAC instance is not > >actually the person, but rather the name(s) associated with that > person>within a particular identity - possibly linked to the name > of a real > >individual which could be seen as the surrogate for the "person," > but it > >is not actually the person (and sometimes not even a real person - > as for > >fictitious characters, etc.). So if you are giving names to the > >entities - won't you need both the persname, corpname, famname as > well>as person, corporate body, family? > > > >I feel I'm not following the goal of the argument...can you help > >explain what's issue here? (I wish we could talk and not email...are > >you by a phone today?) - bt > > > >Dr. Barbara B. Tillett, Ph.D. > >Chief, Cataloging Policy and Support Office > >Library of Congress > >101 Independence Ave., S.E. > >Washington, D.C. 20540-4134 > >U.S.A. > > > >tel.: +1 (202) 707-4714 > >fax: +1 (202) 707-6629 > >email: btil@loc.gov > > > > >>> Daniel Pitti 10/29/2004 10:09:41 AM >>> > > > > >Per-Gunnar Ottosson has pointed out to me that the @type values on > > > > >in the beta dtd are different from the values listed in the Tag > >Library. > > >After a bit of discussion, we concluded that the Tag Library is > >correct > > >and the DTD (and thus the two schemas) are in error. > > > > > >We would like to change the values in the DTD from: > > > > > >corpname | persname | famname > > > > > >to > > > > > >corporatebody | person | family > > > > > >The logic: an EAC instance describes the corporate body, > person, or > > >family, and not the name, as such. > > > > > >Does anyone have any counter arguments to this correction? > > > > > >Daniel > > _______________________________________________ > Eac-l mailing list > Eac-l@mailman.yale.edu > http://mailman.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/eac-l > From stephen.yearl at yale.edu Tue Nov 9 10:36:13 2004 From: stephen.yearl at yale.edu (Stephen Yearl) Date: Tue Nov 9 11:40:53 2004 Subject: [Eac-l] proposed changes to %a.ea Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20041109100502.02289750@sjy2.mail.yale.edu> All: Currently the EAC DTD has the following defined parameter entity: Which I would like you to consider rewritten as: There are two changes here: 1. ea is now CDATA instead of NMTOKEN. This would allows the specification of an xpath-- or other-- expressions for those descriptive resources that do not have unambiguous identifiers. It would also permit the common | delimiter between a MARC field and its subfield. 2. a (new) attribute easys (abbreviated from encoding analog system) may now appear in all locations that @ea can appear. Currently the only location where one may specify an encoding analog system is using @encodinganalogsystem on . I venture that in a complex EAC instance resources and information from many different systems and vocabularies can be employed, each one mapping to a different encodinganalog. The new attribute locally qualifies and allows for cleaner interpretation of @ea's value. In , for instance, one will switch in and out of various encoding analog systems when describing resources: MARC data in , EAD data in , and so forth. Here is a fragmentary example to better illustrate the proposed change: Television and antisocial behavior: field experiments [by] Stanley Milgram [and] R. Lance Shotland. Academic Press. New York, NY 1973 Stanley Milgram Stanley Milgram papers,1927-1993 (inclusive). 90.25 linear ft. (156 boxes) Yale University Library, Manuscripts and Archives The papers consist of correspondence, research and data files, writings, and course material, which document Stanley Milgram's work as an innovative researcher and teacher in the field of social psychology. The papers highlight Milgram's work on obedience to authority, television violence, urban psychology, and communication patterns within society. To parallel easys, I'd also suggest that s @encodinganalogsystem also be shortened to this abbreviated form. regards, St.