[EAS]Public Spaces & Science
pjk at design.eng.yale.edu
Mon May 7 21:13:25 EDT 2001
Mail*Link® SMTP Public Spaces & Science
Dear Colleagues -
Herewith Gary Chapman's last L.A. Times column, with introductory
comments by my friend Pat Lynch [with his permission] of the Yale
Medical School, who read it sooner than I did.
Even Gary's column itself, which used to be weekly, has now been cut
back by the L.A. Times to much lower frequency. Thoughtful writing
about science and technology is getting ever rarer.
All best, --PJK
I was thinking recently myself about how little public impact science
has these days. If you ask anyone outside the academic world, they
might mention computers, or the genome project. That's about it, and
even those subjects are only skimmed over in the media. Ironically,
the conjunction of bioinformatics and biotech is poised to cause huge
changes in our lives, but in the public mind "scientists" have become
cartoon "nerd" figures in commercials, or anonymous "mad scientists"
foisting weirdly modified foods on us.
I remember science and engineering being a large presence in my life
as a child. The space program, IGY, ocean exploration, the huge
expansion of science in the universities after Sputnik, etc. was part
of public consciousness, even in grade schools. Science was an
exciting, optimistic, forward-looking enterprise. Now, if my daughter
thinks about science at all, it seems like a dull gray business,
aloof, rarely bothering to explain itself, vaguely threatening,
constantly involved in things that might harm us.
Of course, it's not that I think science *is* the dull gray threat
that it seems in the popular conciousness, I just wish we were more
vocal in defending an optimistic, humanistic, and rational vision of
Patrick J. Lynch, M.S.
Web Design and Development, and
Yale Center for Advanced Instructional Media
Information Technology Services-Medicine
Yale University School of Medicine
100 Church Street South, Suite 124, New Haven, CT 06519
(203) 737-5034, fax
patrick.lynch at yale.edu
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: L.A. Times column, 5/3/01 -- Public Space
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 11:09:22 -0500
From: Gary Chapman <gary.chapman at mail.utexas.edu>
Reply-To: gary.chapman at mail.utexas.edu
To: chapman at lists.cc.utexas.edu
Below is my Los Angeles Times column for last week, last Thursday,
May 3, 2001. As always, feel free to pass this on but please retain
the copyright information.
I've just returned from Los Angeles, where I spent a quick three
days, two of them as part of the group assembled by Peter Neumann and
Lauren Weinstein for their weekend discussion on the "future of the
Internet." It was an amazing group of people; quite a few Internet
veterans and a rather imposing concentration of intellectual
candlepower. I hope to be writing about some parts of our discussion
One thing that's painfully clear: the "voice" of the scientific and
technical community as an independent source of information and
vision about the future of society is increasingly faint, nearly to
the point of muteness. The recent announcement of the Bush White
House committing the country to ballistic missile defense -- without
any details about cost, means, scope, timetable, etc. -- was followed
by an almost deafening silence from scientific and technical experts.
We still don't have a White House Science Advisor, and whoever is
chosen now will be saddled with a rather striking array of decisions
already made without scientific advice. That cannot be a position
people are clamoring to fill. The current situation is worse than
I've seen in a long time -- as I suggested at the meeting this
weekend, in a phrase stolen from my friend Howard Rheingold, we're
turning off the headlights and stepping on the gas at the same time.
Anyway, turning off rant mode now. We've still got nice spring
weather here in Austin, with real rainstorms this season, and last
week was my last week of class, so, modulo the situation lamented
above, life is good. Hope everyone is doing well too.
gary.chapman at mail.utexas.edu
If you have received this from me, Gary Chapman
(gary.chapman at mail.utexas.edu), you are subscribed to the listserv
that sends out copies of my column in The Los Angeles Times and other
If you wish to UNSUBSCRIBE from this listserv, send mail to
listproc at lists.cc.utexas.edu, leave the subject line blank, and put
"Unsubscribe Chapman" in the first line of the message.
If you received this message from a source other than me and would
like to subscribe to the listserv, the instructions for subscribing
are at the end of the message.
Thursday, May 3, 2001
Paying for Net Foils "Public Space" Idea
By Gary Chapman
Copyright 2001, The Los Angeles Times, All Rights Reserved
There has been talk about preserving "public space" on the Internet
since consumers began to discover the Web and e-mail six to seven
years ago. But new developments in online business are creating a
heightened sense of urgency because many Web-based companies are
starting to explore "pay-per-view" or subscription-based fees to
maximize the value of their intellectual property.
Plus, the deployment of more high-speed broadband networks is
accompanied by trends in online content that would replace the
diverse, expansive and largely free Web with fee-based services and
programming that will look more like commercial TV.
So there is a campaign underway to keep some online information free
and accessible, to ensure what Jeff Chester calls "a digital commons."
Next week he will launch an organization called the Center for
Digital Democracy in Washington, D.C., that will fight for open
access on telecommunications networks, especially digital cable and
digital television broadcast.
A number of national leaders are increasingly concerned that public
interest, educational, cultural and civic content on the Internet
might be shoved aside, or overwhelmed, by the digital and interactive
equivalent of "Survivor II" or the Home Shopping Network.
The challenge is not only how to keep networks open to diverse and
free information but also how to fund interactive digital information
that serves noncommercial purposes.
One of the most ambitious and novel ideas has come from two
television and public policy veterans, Lawrence K. Grossman and
Newton H. Minow. Grossman was the president of both NBC and the
Public Broadcasting Service, and Minow is a former chairman of PBS,
the Federal Communications Commission and the Rand Corp. On April 5,
they announced a proposal for a new Digital Opportunity Investment
Trust, a public agency modeled on the National Science Foundation and
funded with $10 billion from the anticipated public auctions of
telecommunications frequency spectrum to digital wireless companies.
(More information is available at http://www.digitalpromise.org.)
This fund would support the development of digital information and
services for educational, cultural, artistic and civic activities,
Grossman said. Online material is increasingly expensive to create
and will get even more expensive as we move to broadband networks
that can support video and high-quality audio as well as
"The federal government has invested billions in wiring schools
through its E-rate program," Grossman said. "We think it's time to
turn our attention to content, which is equally important."
A similar rationale was behind a dramatic decision by officials at
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who announced last month
that the university will offer nearly all its Web-based courses for
free. This decision threw other universities--many of which were
looking to distance education as a new source of revenue--into an
entirely different position.
Scientists concerned about the availability of scientific research,
especially to researchers in poor countries such as Russia and India,
recently announced a campaign to boycott any online scientific
journals that charge a fee for accessing published research more than
6 months old. The campaign launched by the Public Library of Science
(http://www.publiclibraryofscience.org) has started a heated debate
in the scientific community over who should pay for research
There's a question, however, about whether the Bush administration
will hear these ideas and act. The chairman of the Federal
Communications Commission, Michael K. Powell, has publicly admitted
that he doesn't understand the concept of the "public interest" when
it's applied to telecommunications. That's a bad sign. Bush's
advisors seem likely to let the market dictate how the Internet will
evolve, and too many people in the high-tech industry have tunnel
vision focused on future fortunes in digital services. We'll need
more public activism and understanding about the importance of a
"digital commons." The quality of our cultural legacy is at stake.
Gary Chapman is director of the 21st Century Project at the
University of Texas at Austin. He can be reached at
gary.chapman at mail.utexas.edu.
To subscribe to a listserv that forwards copies of Gary Chapman's
published articles, including his column "Digital Nation" in The Los
Angeles Times, send mail to:
listproc at lists.cc.utexas.edu
Leave the subject line blank. In the first line of the message, put:
Subscribe Chapman [First name] [Last name]
Leave out the brackets, just put your name after Chapman.
Send this message.
You'll get a confirmation message back confirming your subscription.
This message will contain some boilerplate text, generated by the
listserv software, about passwords, which you should IGNORE.
Passwords will not be used or required for this listserv.
Mail volume on this listserv is low; expect to get something two or
three times a month. The list will be used only for forwarding
published versions of Gary Chapman's articles, or else pointers to
URLs for online versions of his articles -- nothing else will be sent
to the list.
To unsubscribe from the listserv, follow the same instructions above,
except substitute the word "Unsubscribe" for "Subscribe."
Please feel free to pass along copies of the forwarded articles, but
please retain the relevant copyright information. Also feel free to
pass along these instructions for subscribing to the listserv, to
anyone who might be interested in such material.
Questions should be directed to Gary Chapman at gary.chapman at mail.utexas.edu.
More information about the EAS-INFO