[EAS] Time and Money
Peter J. Kindlmann
pjk at design.eng.yale.edu
Mon Oct 30 23:46:20 EST 2006
(from INNOVATION, 25 October 2006)
HOW MUCH WILL IT COST YOU TO READ THIS?
Time IS money -- especially if you're paid by the hour. A
series of recent studies at Stanford found that people who are
accustomed to being paid by the hour, like lawyers and retail clerks,
perceive time differently than salaried employees. Hourly workers
perceive time as a commodity that's almost equal to cash. When given
the choice between more time or more money, hourly workers usually
choose the bucks. They're nearly always willing to put in more hours
to earn more pay. No wonder most Americans feel overworked. As one
observer pointed out, leisure time loses some of its appeal when you
stop and realize what that unpaid hour will cost you. As the
opportunity costs of not working become clearer, people can become
motivated -- or stressed out. People who see time as money feel more
stress, the studies found, because the opportunity costs of not
working weigh more heavily on them. This kind of workaholism can
easily be cultivated in others, with the simple stroke of a
calculator. After salaried employees were asked to compute their
hourly rate of pay, they, too, began to indicate a willingness to
work more hours if it meant more money. The "time-is-money" attitude
also affects their decisions to do non-compensated work. Hourly
workers spend about 36% less time volunteering than salaried people.
(Stanford Graduate School of Business Aug 2006)
<http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/news/research/compensation_pfeffer_timeismoney.shtml>
---------------------------------------------------
Several themes intersect here. Firstly, I am reminded of Juliet
Schor's classic study "The Overworked American: The Unexpected
Decline of Leisure," of the workoholic American. More recently Schor
has been researching the related behavior of the workoholic as
consumer, in "The Overspent American: Why We Want What We Don't Need."
Secondly, we ought to reflect on what we get paid for. Though the
time-keeping invented by the 12th century Benedictine monks became
steadily secularized into "business scheduling," the unit of work was
still not the hour, but the job in the sense of task (e.g. making and
delivering a dozen oak barrels). If you were good at what you did,
you would presumably equate time and boss, and after one task you had
to go look for the next one.
With the advent of rote assembly line work, whether of Ford motor
cars or McDonald hamburgers, payment by the hour fully smothered the
equation of independently performed task with payment. A job became
the dread continuum of Charlie Chaplin's "Modern Times."
The ascent of service work over manufacturing, and the banding
together of professionals into larger groups like law firms, which
steadies the supply of work, led to the professionalization of hourly
work. Anxiety about lost opportunities may be compensated by higher
hourly rates.
What the "real job" is, that can become distorted or forgotten. --PJK
"Fanaticism consists in redoubling your efforts when you have
forgotten your aim."
--George Santayana
More information about the EAS-INFO
mailing list