<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><DIV>Sorry, Dick, for expressing an opinion that differs from your own. Rest assured I'll be more careful in future.</DIV>
<DIV>FB<BR><BR>--- On <B>Sun, 2011/4/24, Dick Stegewerns <I><dick.stegewerns@xs4all.nl></I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px" class=jp_replyForwardContainer><BR>
<DIV class=plainMail>Thanks, Faith, for your short comment. The 'worthy' was mainly intended in the objective sense of 'complete and in good condition'. Guess we can nowadays enjoy plenty of 1930s B-films by merely watching Skapa, so I assumed there was no need to make a special effort to see this if you do not have a special interest in the distinct bonus element of Hara Setsuko. Look forward to reading the results of your study (already available?).<BR>DS<BR><BR><BR>On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:58:17 +0900 (JST), faith wrote:<BR>> Thanks, Dick, for your exhaustive summary of the latest Shincho 45<BR>> film clip. Personally I found it fascinating to study the location<BR>> camerawork, character stereotypes and acting schtick of an authentic<BR>> "B" film from that far back and I am indebted to Mr Yasui for giving<BR>> me the chance to do so. Guess we all have our own whimsical ideas of<BR>> what is and is not "worthy."<BR>>
FB<BR><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table>