[NHCOLL-L:4891] RE: open for comment

[Audrey_Barnhart at nps.gov]

AMEN!  Besides, how many biologists do you know who did not enter the field
of biology without an appreciation for the tangible, living organisms?
Don't lose sight of the forest for the names of the trees.

Audrey
Audrey L. Barnhart
Curator
Fort Union Trading Post NHS
15550 Hwy 1804
Williston, ND  58801
(701)-572-9083


                                                                           
             "Bryant, James"                                               
             <JBRYANT at riversid                                             
             eca.gov>                                                   To 
             Sent by:                  malcolm McCallum                    
             owner-nhcoll-l at li         <malcolm.mccallum at herpconbio.org>   
             sts.yale.edu                                               cc 
                                       "nhcoll-l at lists.yale.edu"           
                                       <nhcoll-l at lists.yale.edu>           
             07/20/2010 12:38                                      Subject 
             PM                        [NHCOLL-L:4884] RE: open for        
                                       comment                             
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
             JBRYANT at riverside                                             
                  ca.gov                                                   
                                                                           
                                                                           




With respect to the biological species concept, Malcolm, I entirely concur.
Systematic biology is, ultimately, a “tool kit” for use in examining the
life histories and biogeography of the living world. It surprises me how
often the importance of the biospecies principle gets lost in discussions
of systematics, both classical and genetic. I agree with E. O. Wilson when
he says that solutions to problems like climate change and energy
conservation can all be viewed more clearly through issues related to
biodiversity, but we have to be sure what diversity we’re talking about, a
great deal of it needing to be protected and conserved before we even have
the luxury of worrying how to classify it.



James M. Bryant


Curator of Natural History


Museum Department, City of Riverside


3580 Mission Inn Avenue


Riverside, CA 92501


(951) 826-5273


(951) 369-4970 FAX


jbryant at riversideca.gov

From: malcolm.mccallum.tamut at gmail.com
[mailto:malcolm.mccallum.tamut at gmail.com] On Behalf Of malcolm McCallum
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 6:34 AM
To: Bryant, James
Cc: nhcoll-l at lists.yale.edu
Subject: Re: [NHCOLL-L:4875] open for comment

This will certainly be a useful publication if they meet the ICZN
guidelines.  I know the ICZN used to require hard copies be printed for the
description of new species to be valid, but I think they recently changed
this.  Zootaxa has been running an online journal for years and it is
currently (or last I heard) the largest journal in systematics.

The thing that bothers me is that just naming a species based on its
phylogeny is only a first step.  You cannot conserve a species any more
than you can digest a book's plot by simply knowing its name and position
in the organizational scheme.  There is so much more to know.  If the life
histories of these organisms goes unstudied, then having a name does little
other than indicates about as much as that friend of yours who has
collected tons of books and never read a one.  There is so much more to the
biology of an organism than its position in the systematic scheme.

malcolm McCallum
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Bryant, James <JBRYANT at riversideca.gov>
wrote:
So the NMNH in Washington is touting the launching of two new on-line
journals, Zookeys (perhaps should be Zoökeys?) and Phytokeys (see
http://newsdesk.si.edu/releases/smithsonian-scientists-address-world-biodiversity-crisis-innovative-online-publications
). Looks like the idea is to get taxonomic revisions and updates into
“print” as rapidly as possible. The editors claim this will not only serve
the profession but help preserve biodiversity by “providing the public with
free access to this vital information”. Any thoughts on the merits of this
approach?



James M. Bryant


Curator of Natural History


Museum Department, City of Riverside


3580 Mission Inn Avenue


Riverside, CA 92501


(951) 826-5273


(951) 369-4970 FAX


jbryant at riversideca.gov




--
Malcolm L. McCallum
Managing Editor,
Herpetological Conservation and Biology

1880's: "There's lots of good fish in the sea"  W.S. Gilbert
1990's:  Many fish stocks depleted due to overfishing, habitat loss,
            and pollution.
2000:  Marine reserves, ecosystem restoration, and pollution reduction
          MAY help restore populations.
2022: Soylent Green is People!

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and
destroy all copies of the original message.