[Nhcoll-l] How does your collection handle sites with multiple habitats sampled?

[Tom Schiøtte]

Hi Nate,

I agree with Brian (and yourself apparently). In our setup collecting gear is part of the event record as is a field for ‘Fresh water/Marine/Terrestrial’. These only give meaning when two events are recorded.

Cheers

Tom

Tom Schiøtte

Collection manager, Echinodermata & Mollusca
Natural History Museum of Denmark (Zoology)
Universitetsparken 15
DK 2100 Copenhagen OE

+45 35 32 10 48
TSchioette at snm.ku.dk<mailto:TSchioette at snm.ku.dk>



From: Nhcoll-l <nhcoll-l-bounces at mailman.yale.edu> On Behalf Of Sidlauskas, Brian
Sent: 12. april 2024 02:15
To: Shoobs, Nate <shoobs.1 at osu.edu>; nhcoll-l at mailman.yale.edu
Subject: Re: [Nhcoll-l] How does your collection handle sites with multiple habitats sampled?


You don't often get email from brian.sidlauskas at oregonstate.edu<mailto:brian.sidlauskas at oregonstate.edu>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>

Hi Nate,

Figured I’d respond to this one, since I’m asking you for more caliper advice. 😉

This sounds like a case of one locality with two different collecting events.  Even when a team is targeting all the same nominal taxon (e.g., just fishes, or just insects, or whatever) I think the differences in collecting method (trap versus seine versus shocker) are relevant when more than one method is used at a site.  So, I’d record this as two separate collecting events with different associated data in the collection method field.  There might also be differences in fields like depth, start time and end time.  I’d probably record the microhabitat details in a free text field (not the locality description).

Best Fishes,

---- Brian

____________________________________
Brian Sidlauskas
Professor and Curator of Fishes
Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Sciences
Oregon State University
104 Nash Hall
Corvallis, OR 97331

Pronouns:  he/his/him
brian.sidlauskas at oregonstate.edu<mailto:brian.sidlauskas at oregonstate.edu>
541-737-6789<tel:541-737-6789> (office) 541-224-3850<tel:541-224-3850> (cell)
http://ichthyology.oregonstate.edu/<http://ichthyology.oregonstate.edu/>
https://www.facebook.com/brian.sidlauskas<https://www.facebook.com/brian.sidlauskas>
https://twitter.com/briansidlauskas<https://twitter.com/briansidlauskas>
[Logo  Description automatically generated with medium confidence]


From: Nhcoll-l <nhcoll-l-bounces at mailman.yale.edu<mailto:nhcoll-l-bounces at mailman.yale.edu>> on behalf of "Shoobs, Nate" <shoobs.1 at osu.edu<mailto:shoobs.1 at osu.edu>>
Date: Thursday, April 11, 2024 at 6:39 PM
To: "nhcoll-l at mailman.yale.edu<mailto:nhcoll-l at mailman.yale.edu>" <nhcoll-l at mailman.yale.edu<mailto:nhcoll-l at mailman.yale.edu>>
Subject: [Nhcoll-l] How does your collection handle sites with multiple habitats sampled?


You don't often get email from shoobs.1 at osu.edu<mailto:shoobs.1 at osu.edu>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>


[This email originated from outside of OSU. Use caution with links and attachments.]
Hey all,
This one is for those of you who manage “collecting events” as a separate table or group of tables in a relational database, with a one-to-many relationship to collection objects or specimen lots. I’d like to hear some different perspectives on how your collection would handle the following situation:

A jar containing 5 species of 5 species of land snails bears the following collecting data:

“Blue River at Rt. 101 Bridge, 5 mi N of Anywhere, USA. Station BS-2024-100. Crayfish seined from 1-2 ft of water in 1 pass, snails abundant on bank vegetation. B. Smith, 11-April-2024!”

We know these specimens share a locality, collector, date of collection, etc. But the specific habitat is different, and taxonomists focusing on either group (crayfish or snails) might write the locality a bit differently, for example, a crayfish biologist might write “Blue River at…” whereas a terrestrial malacologist might prefer “Along bank of Blue River at…” to indicate more clearly that the specimens were not found in the river itself. Furthermore, the gear type and method of collecting is different (the crayfish were caught in a seine, but the snails were hand-caught on vegetation.)
Would this be one collecting event in your collection, or two? How would you parse the data, and why?

(Assume that both the crayfish and snails are in-scope for your collection, of course.)

In my personal collecting, I have always treated “in” and “out” of the water as different stations even when at the same place, but I don’t want to impose my personal preference on our collection here without seeing what others do.

-Nate
--
[The Ohio State University]
Nathaniel F. Shoobs
Curator of Mollusks
College of Arts & Sciences Dept. of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology
Museum of Biological Diversity, 1315 Kinnear Rd, Columbus, OH 43212
614-688-1342 (Office)
mbd.osu.edu<http://mbd.osu.edu/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.yale.edu/pipermail/nhcoll-l/attachments/20240412/50796b32/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 5863 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.yale.edu/pipermail/nhcoll-l/attachments/20240412/50796b32/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3609 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://mailman.yale.edu/pipermail/nhcoll-l/attachments/20240412/50796b32/attachment-0001.png>