<div dir="ltr">He's at Cal Acad, right?<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Singer,Randal Anthony <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rsinger@flmnh.ufl.edu" target="_blank">rsinger@flmnh.ufl.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p dir="ltr">Mark Sabaj might be a good contact for this. He made a list of all collections for ASIH. I'm sure in the process he got total specimen values as well.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Randy</p><span class="">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 27, 2015 3:51 PM, Christopher Kemp <<a href="mailto:cjkemp@gmail.com" target="_blank">cjkemp@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>Please post this to the listserv<br>
<br>
</div>
Hi again all, I was really impressed and excited by the feedback for my project collecting examples of newly-described species with long shelf lives. It was great! (But keep them coming too.) I had another question. I don't know if this is empirically known
or somewhat debatable, but I'm trying to make a list of the top 5 natural history collections in the US, and in the world. So, two lists. And I mean in terms of size, or number of specimens. Please weigh in. I'm assuming NMNH, AMNH, the Field for the US, but
who's next? And in the world, I just don't know: the NMNH, the BMNH, the AMNH? I don't know. Share your thoughts. I'm at
<a href="mailto:cjkemp@gmail.com" target="_blank">cjkemp@gmail.com</a>, or respond on the listserv. Thanks in advance! -- ck<br clear="all">
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</span></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">"I am getting so far out, one day I won't come back at all." <br><br>-- William S. <span>Burroughs</span></div></div>
</div>