<div dir="ltr">Biodiversity and Conservation has released my paper "Vertebrate biodiversity losses point to 6th mass extinction" today. If you would like a reprint, email me. <div><br></div><div>Abstract: The human race faces many global to local challenges in the near future. Among these are massive biodiversity losses. The 2012 IUCN/SSC Red List reported evaluations of *56 % of all vertebrates. This included 97 % of amphibians, mammals, birds, cartilaginous fishes, and hagfishes. It also contained evaluations of about 50 % of lampreys, about 38 % of reptiles, and about 29 % of bony fishes. A cursory examination of extinction magnitudes does not immediately reveal the severity of current biodiversity losses because the extinctions we see today have happened in such a short time compared to earlier events in the fossil record. So, we still must ask how current losses of species</div><div>compare to losses in mass extinctions from the geological past. The most recent and best understood mass extinction is the Cretaceous terminal extinction which ends at the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) border, 65 MYA. This event had massive losses of biodiversity (*17 % of families, [50 % of genera, and [70 % of species) and exterminated the dinosaurs. Extinction estimates for non-dinosaurian vertebrates at the K–Pg boundary range from 36 to 43 %. However, there remains much uncertainty regarding the completeness, preservation rates, and extinction magnitudes of the different classes of vertebrates. Fuzzy arithmetic was used to compare recent vertebrate extinction reported in the</div><div>2012 IUCN/SSC Red List with biodiversity losses at the end of K–Pg. Comparisons followed 16 different approaches to data compilation and 288 separate calculations. I tabulated the number of extant and extinct species (extinct ? extinct in the wild), extant island endemics, data deficient species, and so-called impaired species [species with IUCN/</div><div><br></div><div>IT is availale online first via Springer at:<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__link.springer.com_article_10.1007_s10531-2D015-2D0940-2D6&d=AwMFaQ&c=-dg2m7zWuuDZ0MUcV7Sdqw&r=CLFZJ3fvGSmDp7xK1dNZfh6uGV_h-8NVlo3fXNoRNzI&m=ytqA6dR2tHuBm7phb6rG8aKsW1ptWmuRUQqhiH5_Bvs&s=ZwZ7vECywgGTbxvHrjhKshxK9Cnu4JJdtEnznNn--Es&e=">http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10531-015-0940-6</a>.</div><div><br></div><div>If you don't have access, just shoot me an email and I'll send you the pdf of the 22 page manuscript + 68 pages of supplementals. :)</div><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>Malcolm L. McCallum<br>Department of Environmental Studies<br>Green Mountain College<br><br>Managing Editor,<br>Herpetological Conservation and Biology<br><br><br><br>"Peer pressure is designed to contain anyone with a sense of drive" - Allan Nation<br><br>1880's: "There's lots of good fish in the sea" W.S. Gilbert<br>1990's: Many fish stocks depleted due to overfishing, habitat loss,<br> and pollution.<br>2000: Marine reserves, ecosystem restoration, and pollution reduction<br> MAY help restore populations.<br>2022: Soylent Green is People!<br><br>The Seven Blunders of the World (Mohandas Gandhi)<br>Wealth w/o work<br>Pleasure w/o conscience<br>Knowledge w/o character<br>Commerce w/o morality<br>Science w/o humanity<br>Worship w/o sacrifice<br>Politics w/o principle<br><br>Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any<br>attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may<br>contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized<br>review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not<br>the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and<br>destroy all copies of the original message.</div></div></div>
</div>