<html class="apple-mail-supports-explicit-dark-mode"><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Hi all,</div><div><br></div><div>A growing number of startups are building museum solutions built entirely on AI-generated interpretation. Visitors ask questions, and a language model generates personalized explanations on the fly.</div><div><br></div><div>This fundamentally changes what a museum is. Instead of encountering institutional expertise, visitors receive algorithmic predictions optimized for engagement. The museum’s voice, built on research and accountability, gets replaced by pattern matching across training data that the institution never reviewed.</div><div><br></div><div>These systems cannot cite their sources because there are no sources. They generate probable-sounding answers, not verified ones. When they get something wrong, no one is accountable because no person actually made the claim.</div><div><br></div><div>A few questions I keep returning to:</div><div>Where does production end and interpretation begin? Translation and transcription clearly help museums reach more people. But generating explanations of objects based on visitor questions?</div><div><br></div><div>Who is responsible when AI interpretation misleads visitors? The museum? The vendor? The curator who approved the tool?</div><div>Should museums disclose when interpretation is AI-generated? If we hide it, we break trust. If we reveal it, do visitors trust it less?</div><div><br></div><div>What happens to institutional authority when knowledge becomes untraceable to human expertise?</div><div><br></div><div>I wrote more here: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/walkietalk-ie_museums-curation-audioguides-activity-7407049070478852096-KUfB">https://www.linkedin.com/posts/walkietalk-ie_museums-curation-audioguides-activity-7407049070478852096-KUfB</a></div><div><br></div><div>How are others thinking about this?</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div>Thor Martin Bærug</div><div>Co-founder, Walkie Talkie</div><div><a href="https://walkietalk.ie">walkietalk.ie</a></div><div><br></div><div><i>Full disclosure: I run Walkie Talkie, a multilingual audio guide platform for museums. We use AI for translation and text-to-speech but keep all interpretation with museum staff. I have a commercial interest in how this question gets answered, but I genuinely want to hear how the field is thinking about these boundaries.</i></div></body></html>