Satchi
Michael Badzik
mike
Fri Jul 23 23:35:32 EDT 1999
This thread really has generated a lot of interesting words, hasn't it?
There is a lot that I would like to comment on but for now will keep it
to two things:
Aaron wrote:
> Satchi is one of the few cases (Aum and the Miura/LA jiken are others)
> where stories that originated in the wideshows and weeklies made their
> way into "respectable" journalism, but even then, the reporting on the
> Satchi affair in the major papers has still been very minimal.
Could this come from, at least in part, a belief that their hands would
be dirtied by touching something that the "gossip hounds" and "scandal
mongers" first handled? It does seem, also, that the "hard news" people
are a bit more willing to report on hanky-panky in the political arena,
so perhaps there is a feeling that lax morals in its public servants is a
matter of public concern, but that the privacy of ordinary citizens is
something to be respected. Or perhaps not.
> Since wideshows mostly have a female viewership, it is as if "news"
> for them is defined as Satchi, while "real news" is reserved for evening
> shows when the men come home (shows which don't cover Satchi
>(especially if it's NHK))--as if women would have no interest in
>learning about the Hinomaru issue in an afternoon show.
You are going to need better evidence to convince me. There are "real
news" shows on during the day so any housewife who wishes to can keep
up with the "important" events. But then who am I to say what is
important for the largely female daytime audience, the spirited
discussions inspired by the Satchi affair often seem to be fueled by
issues of morality, proper behavior of a Japanese woman, privacy, and
the conduct of the press. These may be far more important subjects to a
wideshow audience than much of what is on the respectable news
programs, and I will bet that a lot of them will tell you that these are
issues with much greater impact on their lives than, say, the suicide of
Eto Jun.
I'm sure Aaron already knows this, but for the benefit of others I will
close with my first rule of Japanese television: Never underestimate the
intelligence of the audience - no matter how simple-minded the
programming may look to you. Come to think of it, Aaron has to agree with
this, given some of the shows he admits to watching!
Michael Badzik
mike at vena.com
More information about the KineJapan
mailing list