2007 stats
Mark D. Roberts
mroberts37
Fri Feb 1 23:24:47 EST 2008
Thanks, Aaron, for these statistics.
Today's Asahi has a brief story on this, the main point being that
tie-ins with TV production companies account for most of the
successes, and that TV seems to increasingly determine viewer's
choices about films:
http://www.asahi.com/english/Herald-asahi/TKY200802020081.html
Looking at the bigger picture, it appears on the surface that
business is okay for the exhibitors, while the same can't really be
said about the Japanese majors. Using the numbers from EIREN, the
average number of admissions in the years 2000-2007 was 159.9 million/
year. This is better than the period 1990-97, when the average was
131.3 million/year (I'm using eight-year intervals instead of decades
because we only have numbers through 2007). It's also slightly better
than the go-go 80s, when average admission was 156.2 million/year.
Can we broadly infer that the big commercial pictures of the past
eight years have had greater popular appeal than those in the 80s and
90s, perhaps owing to widespread use of CGFX in blockbuster films and
huge marketing budgets?
When we look at the market share for Japanese films over these
periods, though, the numbers don't look as good. From 2000-2007,
Japanese films held an average of 38.8%/year share of the market.
Down from 1990-97, when the share was 39.8% and significantly down
from 1980-87 it was 51.3%.
So, the exhibitors seem to be doing better while the production
companies as a whole are gradually losing market share. Though, as
Aaron points out, the number of screens has gone up considerably
during this time (2364 in 1980 vs. 3221 in 2007) and that must
represent a significant investment in construction, staff, upkeep,
etc. Also, the average admission fee has actually come down slightly
over the past 8 years, which goes against the broader trend since the
beginning of the high-growth period to increase ticket prices in
order to maintain revenues as audiences declined. Therefore, the
important numbers would be net profits, rather than gross ticket sales.
The numbers from JVA look somewhat better, underscoring the growth
potential in home viewing rather than public theaters. While the
total sales and number of units sold in 2007 are not yet on the JVA
site (or at least I didn't find them), the average monthly numbers
for films rented in 2007 are there. To summarize, from 2004 to 2007,
the average number of monthly rentals went up 24%, and average yearly
revenue went up 14%. However, the JVA stats don't indicate whether
the revenue from rentals is gross or net, because they also list the
volume of procurements. If it is gross, then subtracting expenditures
on new titles, the rental revenue increase from 2004 to 2007 is
around 8%.
During this same period (2004-2007), the average cost of rentals came
down very slightly (from 398 to 385 yen), while the cost of weekly
rentals increased slightly. In 2004, revenue from VHS rentals still
exceeded that from DVDs, but by 2007, 95% of rental revenue comes
from DVDs. Video rental membership has fluctuated over this period,
with a slight increase. Interestingly, there is an increase in the
number of women who hold memberships, relative to men. Procurement of
new units has gone up, from an average of 387 units/month to 545
units/month, while the total number of titles increased from an
average of 16043 to 18966. I.e., many of these "units" are probably
duplicates, so that a shop can fill shelf after shelf with "Lost" and
"24".
The JVA sales figures for 2007 are not there yet, but in 2006 the
total sales of video software was 330.8 Billion yen for 105.1 million
units sold. Compare that to gross box office receipts of 202.9
Billion yen total for 164.2 million theater admissions. Average sale
price for video software was thus 3145 yen/unit, while average ticket
price in a theater was 1233 yen.
Finally, I found some of the JVA numbers rather surprising. In the
breakdown of sales by channel for 2006, they suggest that of all
video software consumed about 73% of the total units (i.e., not
revenue) were via retail sales while only 22% were rentals. I would
have assumed rather more rentals.
M
More information about the KineJapan
mailing list