Furyo Shojo / Naruse

[eigagogo at free.fr]

thanks for the feedbackS!
Regarding "Shonenki", Audie Bock was re-using statements from a Richie/Anderson
book.


Selon Alexander Jacoby <a_p_jacoby at yahoo.co.uk>:

> I'm not sure what?she means by describing "Shonenki" as a "flesh movie". As I
> recall from seeing it at the Japan Foundation four or five years ago, it was
> a very earnest story about a boy - the son of a liberal father - growing up
> during the war. It's quite heartfelt and doesn't feel like a commercial chore
> at all.
>
> ?
>
> --- On Thu, 30/7/09, eigagogo at free.fr <eigagogo at free.fr> wrote:
>
>
> From: eigagogo at free.fr <eigagogo at free.fr>
> Subject: Furyo Shojo / Naruse
> To: KineJapan at lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
> Date: Thursday, 30 July, 2009, 2:25 AM
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> Is? Naruse's 'Furyo shojo' (1949) considered to be a lost movie ?
> According to Audie Bock's book on Naruse both negative & dupe positive are
> lost,
> same goes for the screenplay. This was written in 1983 .. maybe there have
> been
> news since?
>
> In the same book, there's mention of 'flesh' movies made by 'masters' in the
> 50s
> such as Kinoshita's Shonen-ki & Toyoda's Haru no sasayaki .. is there any
> others
> similar 'commercial' sex-oriented movies made by 'famous' directors?
>
>
> thanks!
>
>
>
>