mroberts37 at mail-central.com
Tue Nov 10 07:31:40 EST 2009
On Nov 10, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Roger Macy wrote:
> Marcus said: 'If there IS one pressing problem it is that they keep
> the list secret.'
> Surely it's more than that: this is the first time I've understood
> that there IS a prepared list. Surely, the JF's commitments to
> rights-holders cannot extend to keeping the EXISTENCE of a list
> secret, a la SCAP ?
The existence of the catalog is not a secret, but its contents are.
The first time I inquired about it, the exact response was: "We cannot
make our film collection list public due to our agreement with the
> To borrow an americanism, why isn't this a no-brainer ? Why can't
> the JF say on their websites something to the effect that
> " The Foundation maintains a collection of film prints in various
> formats, subtitled in english, roughly comprising the periods :-
> 1920s n
> ... nn
> 2000s nn
> The Foundation welcomes enquiries from aaaaas and bbbbbs about the
> supply of prints, subject to prior agreement with the rights-holders
> and will be happy to give further advice."
I'm not sure which JF site you're looking at. The sites for all the
regional offices might not include a description of the A-V materials
program. I notice that the London office site does say: "The Japan
Foundation holds a stock of Japanese films (35mm or 16mm) with English
subtitles in Tokyo for loan (subject to availability)." The main site
in Japan elaborates on this and includes a comprehensive list of
overseas screenings and retrospectives, past and present <http://www.jpf.go.jp/e/culture/media/oversea/index.html
>. While they don't say that they welcome inquiries from anyone, they
do mention "joint sponsorship with film specialist organizations".
This seems reasonable, given the resources they actually have available.
Aside from the secret catalog, the disconnect here is perhaps that the
JF wants all inquires to come through the regional offices first, but
the web sites for some of them may be less comprehensive. The main
site could also have more detailed information, but it's not totally
derelict. Building a really good web site actually isn't a no-brainer,
and thus many organizations have mediocre-to-bad sites. The main JF
site seems generally reasonable. I never feel frustrated looking for
The film catalog, though, is a no-brainer. If the secrecy issue were
resolved, they could just put it into their regular database, along
with the hundreds of other media items already there (e.g., NHK
documentaries with titles like "Japanese vagueness"). It looks like
they have the electronic infrastructure in place. A public catalog
would also make it possible to set up a standard workflow for film
requests going through the JFIC site. It could even save their staff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the KineJapan