FWD: incompl chrysalids -painted ladies GEHP

Gordon Ramel bug.man at bbsrc.ac.uk
Fri Jun 13 02:34:30 EDT 1997

Does any one have an explanation for this, please reply to the original
questioner if so.

----- Forwarded message follows -----
Delivery-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 97 03:19:11 +0100
Alternate-Recipient: allowed
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 97 03:18:28 +0100
Received: by X.400 UK.AC. .GB; Fri Jun 13 03:18:28 1997
From: redragon40 at aol.com
To: bugnet at ero.ent.iastate.edu
Subject: incompl chrysalids -painted ladies GEHP
Message-ID: <199706130214.VAA18072(a)mailhub.*@MHS>
Sender: bugnet at ero.ent.iastate.edu
Content-Return: allowed
X-Mailer: MAILworks 1.7-A-2
Encoding: 9 IA5TEXT

This message is from carol ross,  <redragon40 at aol.com>, a third gr teacher from Chalfont, PA, Bucks County.

our third gr classes are all raising painted ladies.  several classes have chrysalids that are incomplete.  the chrysalis is like a cap over the thoracic region, extending over the head between the eyes in a point.  we would like to know if this is due to handling, or what.  any advice would be greatly appreciated.sincerely, carol ross

NOTE: This message was sent using a WWW form. Replies should be sent to the following email address which was typed manually, and may  be incorrect: <redragon40 at aol.com>.

----- End of forwarded message -----

More information about the Leps-l mailing list