mwalker at aisvt.bfg.com
Tue Sep 23 09:14:07 EDT 1997
> That is not the criterion, and you know it. Quite honestly, all that Brazil
> really requires for permits, as far as I can see, is that you have a
> scientific reason for collecting, and that you agree to deposit any primary
> types in a Brazilian institution.
I understand the problem from Brazil's standpoint, I really do. It's my
standpoint that I'm arguing on behalf of, and there aren't many speaking on my
behalf. You've mentioned:
This is not anti-collecting policy, it's
> anti-COMMERCIAL collecting policy, and anti-EXPLOITATION policy.
I, too, am against commercialized exploitation of Leps and other fauna. It is
very bad for my hobby. But you haven't made an exception for non-exploitive or
non-commercial collecting of common species by amateur hobbyists like me. Can
you explain? Can you justify?
BTW, I hesitate to condemn _commercialization_ in general, since I buy nets and
pins and cases and other stuff, which a business such as BioQuip commercially
provides (thank goodness, I remember what it was like to make it all from
scratch). If I knew that there would not be a market for bugs that are
threatened, I don't think that buying and selling would bother me at all. But
there is a market for these - always some people who are willing to supply and
consume them. As a result, it scares me away from this aspect of my hobby,
although my primary reason for not buying Leps is that I enjoy looking for them
so much. Still, it seems to me that a butterfly collection (which ultimately
belongs in a museum) could be created and enjoyed for it's aesthetic value, and
not prized for it's economic value. That is to say that an amateur collector
such as I would ideally have no other motive but to glory in the diversity of
creation - not to try and _complete_the_set_ or possess the _Mantle
_rookie_card_ (to move the analogy from postage stamps to baseball cards).
If that were the case, I suspect I would not be inclined to whine.
More information about the Leps-l