John Grehan jrg13 at
Thu Sep 10 17:22:11 EDT 1998

    Mark Walker.

As far as I'm
>concerned, the miracle of metamorphosis is just one of many very convincing
>evidences of divine purpose, a thing that John Grehan has not embraced -

I am agnostic with respect to the "miracle" of metamorphosis providing
evidence of divine purpose.

 I do think it to be a huge stretch to suggest that random mutations
>are responsible for this process.  Talk about blind faith!

If this is being imputed to John Grehan then Mark is in error as I have
questioned the assumption or paradigm by others that mutations are

>        Mutation a "creative force"?  I think not.  A decay of order, a
>jumbling of information, a mistake of nature. Left to its own, the result
>would be chaos, an eventual decline of life as we know it.

Not according to some geneticists

Isn't this a scientific position?

It might be one scientific position, but not the only one.

Aren't all of the laws of physics in agreement?

with what?

Sincerely, John Grehan

More information about the Leps-l mailing list