Darwin v Lamarck v Reality
Jorolat
jorolat at aol.com
Sat Jul 31 08:16:10 EDT 1999
Selection" and "The inheritance of acquired characteristics". On the one hand
is an unpopular view that inherently recognises non-intelligent life is both
real and alive and on the other is a theory that, because it has little reality
external to the intellect, can`t be tested.
The single-cell Common Ancestor that lived 3.6 billion years ago had the
natural capability to create copies of itself each with an independent life. It
was able to do this without thought, theory or intelligence because the ability
was innate.
Surely suggesting that organisms with such an astonishing capability may
also have had, under specific conditions, the innate ability to evolve is only
being sensible rather than sensational?.
Jorolat
http://members.aol.com/jorolat
An Internal Evolutionary Mechanism: A simple Model and Method of Testing
How Psychology colours perception of Natural Realities
Trauma/Bullying/Social Violence/Professional Abusers etc.
More information about the Leps-l
mailing list