Names don't have to mean a thing!
Michael Gochfeld
gochfeld at eohsi.rutgers.edu
Wed Jun 16 07:08:43 EDT 1999
If names don't have to mean anything (and I agree that the ICZN) doesn't
impose restrictions on meaning), why should reviewers have anything to
say about the name proposed by the describer.
I'm not sure that the code allows random letters (I thought it had to be
Latinizable). But it does allow anagrams. Again drawing on birds: the
Eurasian or Common Kingfisher (known in England as The Kingfisher) has
the generic name Alcedo. Some tropical genera were subsequently given
anagram names: Dacelo and Lacedo.
If the code did allow random letters would it preclude random numbers or
what we lovingly refer to as alphanumeric designations.
M. Gochfeld
More information about the Leps-l
mailing list