endangered species news
Kondla, Norbert FOR:EX
Norbert.Kondla at gems3.gov.bc.ca
Wed Nov 10 18:14:04 EST 1999
fyi - the latest news on Canadian endangered species legislation
PUBLICATION National Post
DATE Mon 08 Nov 1999
EDITION National
SECTION/CATEGORY News
PAGE NUMBER A1 / Front
BYLINE Robert Fife, Ottawa Bureau Chief
STORY LENGTH 765
HEADLINE: Razing habitats of at-risk animals to be criminalized
OTTAWA - New endangered species legislation will contain criminal
law sanctions to preserve the habitat of animals at risk of
extinction on private property, and the federal government is
prepared to create a $250-million fund to compensate landowners
who agree to protect critical habitat, according to secret cabinet
documents obtained by the National Post.
The government will invoke its criminal law powers to step in to
protect endangered species if a "province does not have the
capacity or intention to provide protection for a listed species,"
say the cabinet documents, stamped secret.
Ottawa will also prosecute landowners, impose heavy fines of up to
$500,000 and perhaps confiscate their habitat lands if they
deliberately or recklessly engage in the "outright destruction" of
critical lakes, woodlands, swamps or forests.
There are 339 endangered species in Canada, such as the peary
caribou, the eastern cougar and the loggerhead shrike.
"The proposed legislation will provide legal protection, including
automatic prohibitions against killing, harming, harassing,
capturing, possessing, buying, selling, etc., an individual of an
endangered or threatened species," the documents say.
** David Anderson, the Environment Minister, will propose a
$250-million "species at risk stewardship fund" to help compensate
landowners for any economic loss. Some of the funds would also be
used to maintain and recover habitats. Finance Department
documents show that funding will be provided over a five-year
period.
"It is anti-social behaviour for someone to do something to wipe
some species off the planet, but it is also undemocratic for
government not to assist someone to deal with the impact of
protecting wildlife habitats, but it is going to cost money," a
senior government official said.
"We are going to try to emphasize more sugar than vinegar. We
can't expect someone to comply if what you are doing is limiting
or ruining their business by saying: 'Your land is critical
habitat for the recovery of the species. You cannot use your
land.' "
On federal lands, the government will protect the habitat of
endangered species and it will expect the provinces, corporations
or private landowners to safeguard species and habitat on their
lands. Failure to do so would cause Ottawa to invoke its criminal
law powers, although anyone who is prosecuted would not have a
criminal record.
_
"There may be cases where ... agreement cannot be reached --and
then it will be important to take steps to secure unprotected
critical habitat. It would be politically untenable for a federal
minister of the environment not to include some measures for
protecting critical habitat in federal species at risk
legislation," the documents warn.
"The federal government can prohibit the destruction of essential
habitat whether it occurs on federal, provincial or private lands
as long as such habitat is clearly delineated."
Mr. Anderson is about to introduce a new endangered species act in
Parliament to strengthen the provisions of previous legislation,
which died on the order paper in 1997. Bill C-65 would have
protected the nests and dens of endangered species, but it would
not have prevented clear-cutting, bulldozing or flooding of vital
habitat.
The document notes that loss of habitat accounts for 75% of the
decline of wild species that are currently listed as threatened or
endangered. The only solution is to protect the habitat and to put
recovery plans in place where the habitat is threatened, the
documents say, while stressing that this should be accomplished by
co-operating with the provinces and private landowners.
"Options such as agreements, programs, stewardship initiatives
should be explored first. On private lands in particular,
landowners should be encouraged to protect species and their
habitats, and be provided with the tools and incentives to foster
such behaviour."
Mr. Anderson will propose compensation and cash incentives to
landowners who cannot use their land for economic gain or who take
measures to improve their habitat to recover a species to healthy
status.
"But if someone is not prepared to get into the plan, or the
provincial legislation is not garnering any kind of clear
activity, then there is going to have to be other means to ensure
compliance, and if it involves a sanction under the Endangered
Species Act, then that is what we are going to do," the official
said.
Aware that some provinces, particularly Alberta and Quebec, might
object to Ottawa's use of its criminal law powers, the document
stresses it will "seldom be used" because every effort will be
made to get provincial agreement.
The proposed legislation will create an independent scientific
body called the Committee on Status of Endangered Species to
decide which species of animal and plant are in danger of
extinction.
| West Coast Environmental Law Association and Research Foundation
| 1001 - 207 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6B 1H7
| Phone: 604-684-7378, or 1-800-330-9235 FAX: 604-684-1312
| admin at wcel.org http://www.wcel.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Norbert Kondla P.Biol., RPBio.
Forest Ecosystem Specialist, Ministry of Environment
845 Columbia Avenue, Castlegar, British Columbia V1N 1H3
Phone 250-365-8610
Mailto:Norbert.Kondla at gems3.gov.bc.ca
http://www.env.gov.bc.ca
More information about the Leps-l
mailing list