BT Pollen not so Dangerous to Monarchs
Susan Courson
scourson at csonline.net
Mon Feb 14 22:36:43 EST 2000
Thank you for this post. I have been searching for information on this issue. We
are writing a series of lessons to be used in a biotechnology workshop this summer
for secondary science teachers.
Rcjohnsen wrote:
> QUICK LINKS
> Click on the banner above to visit one of our advertisers.
> RELATED: Stories Newsgroups Sites Books < PREVIOUS
> NEXT >Source: University Of Guelph (http://www.uofguelph.ca)
> Contact: Margaret Boyd , Research Communications Officer
> Phone: 519-824-4120, Ext. 2776; Email: margaret at research.uoguelph.ca
> Date: Posted 2/9/2000
>
> New Research Suggests Bt-Corn Not Harmful To Monarch Butterfly
>
> The Monarch butterfly is alive and well, despite exaggerated and misleading
> reports that biotechnology is threatening it, says a University of Guelph
> researcher.
> Field research conducted by Prof. Mark Sears, chair of the University of
> Guelph's Department of Environmental Biology and chair of the Canadian Corn
> Pest Coalition, shows pollen from Bt corn -- Bacillus thuringiensis, a
> naturally-occurring soil-borne bacterium which selectively targets specific
> groups of insects -- is not found in high enough doses on most milkweed plants
> (the food plant of the caterpillars) to hurt Monarch butterfly larvae.
> Although Bt is harmless to humans and other animals, a U.S. study claimed
> pollen from Bt-corn damaged Monarch butterfly larvae. The study sparked a media
> frenzy and public concern about genetically modified foods.
> Sears says the U.S. study didn't demonstrate to what extent its preliminary
> findings applied to field situations. The study was completed in a lab, and the
> dosage of pollen used wasn't reported.
> "The actual threat to the Monarch butterfly can only be determined by
> assessing the dosage that affects the larvae and their degree of exposure to
> Bt-corn pollen in the field," says Sears.
> Sears is leading a two-year project to determine the ecological impacts of
> Bt-corn pollen on selected non-target butterfly species, including the Monarch.
> So far, studies indicate that Bt- corn is not as big a threat as
> environmentalists and the news media had anticipated.
> "Outside of corn fields, you probably wouldn't find concentrated dosages of
> pollen because wind and rain removes it from the surface of the milkweed
> leaves," says Sears. Sears's study focused on Bt pollen and how far it travels.
> He examined milkweed stands in corn fields, at their edges, then at distances
> of five, 10 , 25, 50 and 100 metres away. He found that within the fields,
> approximately 150 pollen grains/cm2 were found on milkweed leaves. At the field
> edges, 80 to 100 grains/cm2 were found, and at five metres, only one grain/cm2
> was found. He then compared these findings to values obtained from a
> "dose-response assay" from which data of increasing doses are plotted against
> increased mortality rates to determine dosages with negative effects on
> Monarch butterfly larvae.
> Results show that 135 grains/cm2 the lowest dosage he has tested on milkweed
> leaves so far and similar to that found on milkweed leaves in the field had
> no greater effect on Monarch larvae than when they were fed non-Bt pollen.
> "Our findings are consistent with other studies across North America," says
> Sears. "Bt- corn has always shown to be harmless to both humans and animals,
> and we now know it isn't a major threat to the Monarch butterfly."
> Sears is being assisted by research associate Diane Stanley-Horn and
> research technician Heather Mattila from the University of Guelph, along with
> seed industry representatives and corn growers. His research is sponsored by
> the Canadian Food Inspection Agency and Environment Canada.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by University Of
> Guelph for journalists and other members of the public. If you wish to quote
> from any part of this story, please credit University Of Guelph as the original
> source. You may also wish to include the following link in any citation:
>
> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/02/000208094017.htm
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RELATED: Stories Newsgroups Sites Books < PREVIOUS
> NEXT >Copyright © 1995-2000 ScienceDaily Magazine | Email:
> editor at sciencedaily.com
> Best viewed with Internet Explorer or Netscape Navigator (version 3.0 or
> higher)
More information about the Leps-l
mailing list