Monarch Extinction (substantial evidence?)

[Charles Bordelon]

UNSUBSCRIBE.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Donna Brunet" <dbrunet at coin.org>
To: <Leps-L at lists.yale.edu>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 6:49 AM
Subject: RE: Monarch Extinction (substantial evidence?)


> I think there might be a simple reason for the photos looking different
from
> the maps.  A lot of ground that was 80-100% forest cover is now 30-80%
> forest cover.  The maps are a look from overhead straight down, and your
> photos are a view from the side, which would (especially at a distance),
> hide any thinning of forest cover.
>
> ------------------
> Donna Brunet
> Columbia, Missouri
> dbrunet at coin.org
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leps-l at lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-leps-l at lists.yale.edu]On
> Behalf Of Paul Cherubini
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 9:59 PM
> To: leps-l at lists.yale.edu
> Cc: TILS-leps-talk at yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: FW: [leps-talk] Re: Monarch Extinction (substantial
> evidence?)
>
>
> Example:  here is the animation of the changes in forest cover at
> the El Rosario Reserve presented side by side with actual photos of
> the reserve http://www.saber.net/~monarch/animation2.jpg
>
>
> Paul Cherubini
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>    For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
>
>    http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
>
>


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl