Mosquito control No Mo
Neil Jones
neil at nwjones.demon.co.uk
Sun May 8 16:24:36 EDT 2005
On Sunday 08 May 2005 20:51, Hank Brodkin wrote:
> Neil -
> Surely you are aware that many of the English clergy had a tradition of
> studying nature and thus added greatly to our knowledge.
Of course. Perhaps I didn't explain my self well.
> We can still pick and choose from what Ron - or indeed any of us have to
> offer. Depending upon your definition of the word scientist very few of us
> would qualify.
That is just the point. The definition of a scientist I am using is " A person
using scientific methods". You can easily be a Preacher AND a scientist.
It is fairly easy to fit this definition but Ron is risking falling outside
it. As I said he is probably a nice guy but he is risking his reputation by
not thinking about what he says. THe problem is that he jumps to so many
conclusions I doubt everything he says now,
> Should Leps-L be any more of a forum for espousing religious views than
> Tils ? I think not. But then I am the pot calling the kettle black ;-)
--
Neil Jones- Neil at nwjones.demon.co.uk
------------------------------------------------------------
For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
More information about the Leps-l
mailing list