I've been watching this discussion...
Jonathan Sylvestre
josylvestre at sympatico.ca
Mon Feb 21 10:19:24 EST 2011
Climate change do not mean that it will be warmer somewhere and colder
somewhere else... When the atmosphere temperature (energy) increase, the
consequence is much more instable weather. Cold and warm temperature records
will be broken more often at a given place... precipitations will be more
inconsistent, etc...
Climate change is not a problem. The problem is the rate of the change that
is too high. Animals and plants can't adapt to the rapid changes.
This happened many times during the earth history (for different reasons,
more often because of volcanos, etc..) causing numbers of extinctions of
animals and plants species.
Right now, human are burning tons and tons of oil and gaz and release
trapped carbon in the atmosphere at an accelerating rate... THAT NEVER
HAPENED BEFORE. This contribute to climate change. We are also destroying
all the forests of the planet and the oceans increased acidity make them
less able to absorb the great part of the carbon we release...
Paul, will you suggest to do nothing ?
-----Message d'origine-----
De : owner-leps-l at lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-leps-l at lists.yale.edu] De la
part de Paul Cherubini
Envoyé : 19 février 2011 13:34
À : Leps-l
Objet : Re: I've been watching this discussion...
Stan Gorodenski wrote:
> in the beginning years ago, I saw that global warming
> deniers denied that global warming is occurring.
30 years ago evidence of substantial warming from ground
based weather stations was lacking even in your own
state of Arizona. This graph of average annual temps in
Arizona 1895-1975 shows a stable or cooling trend
even though atmospheric C02 was rising during that period:
http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae78/18R-C/azc.jpg
> When they could no longer deny global warming is
> occurring, they then changed their position and said
> that it was a natural process, somehow related to sunspots
> or whatever.
Yes, your own state of Arizona warmed after about 1985:
Graph of average annual temps in AZ 1895-2010:
http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/ae78/18R-C/aza.jpg
Can anyone explain, with high confidence, why Arizona was
hotter and drier around 1895-1905 as compared to around 1965-
1975? If not, then can anyone reliably predict, with high
confidence, how warm and dry Arizona will be in 2020 or 2050?
If not, then can anyone claim, with high confidence, that
the cooling and warming trends we have seen in Arizona
over the past 115 years have anthropomorphic causes?
> I can only rely on the research climatologists are doing
> and I have more confidence in this than what is said in these
> these discussions and other blogs.
On Oct. 6, 2010 Harold Lewis, emeritus professor of physics
at the University of California, Santa Barbara wrote this:
"For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at
being an APS Fellow [American Physical Society] all these years
has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure
at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society. It is of course,
the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars
driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has
carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest
and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my
long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt
that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate
documents, which lay it bare. (Montford¹s book organizes
the facts very well.) I don¹t believe that any real physicist,
nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion."
Paul Cherubini
------------------------------------------------------------
For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
------------------------------------------------------------
For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
More information about the Leps-l
mailing list