[NHCOLL-L:1461] RE: labels for wet collections
Simmons, John E
jsimmons at ku.edu
Tue Feb 5 14:08:56 EST 2002
There has been a good study reported of Resistal driving the acidification
of ethanol. See: Andrei, M. A. and H. H. Genoways. 1999. Changes in pH
in museum storage fluids, I-effects of Resistal paper labels. Collection
Forum 13(2):63-75.
Your best option is probably a thermal printer, which produces labels on
spunbonded polyethylene sheets. One source of thermal printers is:
Alpha Systems, Inc.
13509 E. Boundary Road
Midlothian, VA 23112
800-849-9870
http://www.preservationtag.com
John E. Simmons
Collection Manager, Natural History Museum
and
Coordinator, Historical Administration and Museum Studies Program
University of Kansas
Dyche Hall
1345 Jayhawk Boulevard
Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7561
Phone 785-864-4508
FAX 785-864-5335
jsimmons at ku.edu
-----Original Message-----
From: Cokendolpher at aol.com [mailto:Cokendolpher at aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 12:54 PM
To: nhcoll-l at lists.yale.edu
Subject: [NHCOLL-L:1460] labels for wet collections
Currently, I am using the non-bleed, alcohol resistant, cloth ribbons from
Access Computer Printer Products (same as the ribbons that were formerly
made
by Automated Office Products) and 100% cotton bond paper on a dot-matrix
printer. I am looking for a way to produce better looking (sharper letters)
long-term labels that will fit into small vials.
I have read that Resistall paper might be better but that it was acidic in
alcohol solution. Does anyone care to comment on this paper versus 100%
cotton bond paper for labels that will be stored in 70-80% ethanol?
Is there an impact printer that produces a relatively sharp image at 4-7
point size? Does the number of pins in a dot matrix head alter the image
clarity? In other words, does a 24 pin printer produce a sharper image than
a 9 pin printer?
Thanks in advance for your comments.
James Cokendolpher
Biological Consultant
Lubbock, Texas
More information about the Nhcoll-l
mailing list