[NHCOLL-L:4896] RE: open for comment

Audrey_Barnhart at nps.gov Audrey_Barnhart at nps.gov
Thu Jul 22 12:51:13 EDT 2010


Awesome!   I've never met a jumping spider I didn't love.  Cute & gentle
little things, with so much personality for helping park visitors to see
spiders through new eyes.  Speaking of eyes, the "headlamp" eyes on jumping
spiders fascinate chilluns & grownups alike.  Once they see them (using a
picture if the real dudes creep folks out), there's an instant connection,
no matter how tiny, that helps "break the ice" of fear and plant a seed of
curiosity.  At that point, you're usually over halfway to the point of
appreciation.

The momma wolf spider carting a host of spiderlings on her back, the
blue-eyed snake whose "sunburn" is getting ready to peel, the lady Merlin
in the city park who's keckkk-keckkk-keckkking to her mate, the patch of
prairie that is being "stalked" by invasive species--all can be

As I've learned from environmental ed flops and successes, it's when people
realize that they so have much in common with critters, plants, systems &
scenery, that they begin to see ourselves as part of it.  And, as important
as the facts & figures are to understanding how life ticks, if the
connection becomes extinct then everything else will, too....

So, besides the systematics, the biochemical responses and other important
minutiae, staying in tune with the beasties and their role in the grand
scheme is huge, because it keeps us connected and impassioned.  So is
learning effective ways to help the people we come into contact with to
reconnect with the beasties we study and their place in the world.

P.S.  Would any of those new "jumpers" be found in NW North Dakota?

Audrey
Audrey L. Barnhart
Curator
Fort Union Trading Post NHS
15550 Hwy 1804
Williston, ND  58801
(701)-572-9083


                                                                           
             "David Richman"                                               
             <nmbugman at taipan.                                             
             nmsu.edu>                                                  To 
             Sent by:                  <nhcoll-l at lists.yale.edu>,          
             owner-nhcoll-l at li         <owner-nhcoll-l at lists.yale.edu>     
             sts.yale.edu                                               cc 
                                                                           
                                                                   Subject 
             07/22/2010 10:16          [NHCOLL-L:4894] RE: open for        
             AM                        comment                             
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
             nmbugman at taipan.n                                             
                  msu.edu                                                  
                                                                           
                                                                           




Exactly!  I started out by being interested in the behavior and life
history of jumping spiders (family Salticidae).  I soon found out that the
taxonomy was a mess and that even if a species was described, because of
high sexual dimorphism, the other sex was likely to be unknown. So I spent
a lot of my time (when I was not earning my keep by being an economic
entomologist specializing in biological control) in trying to untie knotty
problems of taxonomy. Molecular biology was coming into its own then, but
as I enjoyed the whole organisms I finally dropped my attempt to break into
electrophoresis and stuck with behavior and morphology.  I did rather envy
the few people who could go beyond taxonomy and systematics and spend more
time with the living organisms, but there was certainly enough work to be
done.  Even so my species count for new descriptions stopped at 14 this
year, but seven were from the United States!


David B. Richman
College Professor and Curator of the Arthropod Museum
Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Weed Science
New Mexico State University
Las Cruces, NM 88003
Ph. 575 646 7082
Fax 575 646 8087




Of course the living organism is the most interesting and I think I will
spend more time with such after my retirement in March.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nhcoll-l at lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-nhcoll-l at lists.yale.edu]
On Behalf Of Audrey_Barnhart at nps.gov
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 4:46 PM
To: JBRYANT at riversideca.gov
Cc: malcolm McCallum; nhcoll-l at lists.yale.edu;
owner-nhcoll-l at lists.yale.edu
Subject: [NHCOLL-L:4891] RE: open for comment

AMEN!  Besides, how many biologists do you know who did not enter the field
of biology without an appreciation for the tangible, living organisms?
Don't lose sight of the forest for the names of the trees.

Audrey
Audrey L. Barnhart
Curator
Fort Union Trading Post NHS
15550 Hwy 1804
Williston, ND  58801
(701)-572-9083



             "Bryant, James"
             <JBRYANT at riversid
             eca.gov>                                                   To
             Sent by:                  malcolm McCallum
             owner-nhcoll-l at li         <malcolm.mccallum at herpconbio.org>
             sts.yale.edu                                               cc
                                       "nhcoll-l at lists.yale.edu"
                                       <nhcoll-l at lists.yale.edu>
             07/20/2010 12:38                                      Subject
             PM                        [NHCOLL-L:4884] RE: open for
                                       comment

             Please respond to
             JBRYANT at riverside
                  ca.gov






With respect to the biological species concept, Malcolm, I entirely concur.
Systematic biology is, ultimately, a “tool kit” for use in examining the
life histories and biogeography of the living world. It surprises me how
often the importance of the biospecies principle gets lost in discussions
of systematics, both classical and genetic. I agree with E. O. Wilson when
he says that solutions to problems like climate change and energy
conservation can all be viewed more clearly through issues related to
biodiversity, but we have to be sure what diversity we’re talking about, a
great deal of it needing to be protected and conserved before we even have
the luxury of worrying how to classify it.



James M. Bryant


Curator of Natural History


Museum Department, City of Riverside


3580 Mission Inn Avenue


Riverside, CA 92501


(951) 826-5273


(951) 369-4970 FAX


jbryant at riversideca.gov

From: malcolm.mccallum.tamut at gmail.com
[mailto:malcolm.mccallum.tamut at gmail.com] On Behalf Of malcolm McCallum
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 6:34 AM
To: Bryant, James
Cc: nhcoll-l at lists.yale.edu
Subject: Re: [NHCOLL-L:4875] open for comment

This will certainly be a useful publication if they meet the ICZN
guidelines.  I know the ICZN used to require hard copies be printed for the
description of new species to be valid, but I think they recently changed
this.  Zootaxa has been running an online journal for years and it is
currently (or last I heard) the largest journal in systematics.

The thing that bothers me is that just naming a species based on its
phylogeny is only a first step.  You cannot conserve a species any more
than you can digest a book's plot by simply knowing its name and position
in the organizational scheme.  There is so much more to know.  If the life
histories of these organisms goes unstudied, then having a name does little
other than indicates about as much as that friend of yours who has
collected tons of books and never read a one.  There is so much more to the
biology of an organism than its position in the systematic scheme.

malcolm McCallum
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Bryant, James <JBRYANT at riversideca.gov>
wrote:
So the NMNH in Washington is touting the launching of two new on-line
journals, Zookeys (perhaps should be Zoökeys?) and Phytokeys (see
http://newsdesk.si.edu/releases/smithsonian-scientists-address-world-biodiversity-crisis-innovative-online-publications

). Looks like the idea is to get taxonomic revisions and updates into
“print” as rapidly as possible. The editors claim this will not only serve
the profession but help preserve biodiversity by “providing the public with
free access to this vital information”. Any thoughts on the merits of this
approach?



James M. Bryant


Curator of Natural History


Museum Department, City of Riverside


3580 Mission Inn Avenue


Riverside, CA 92501


(951) 826-5273


(951) 369-4970 FAX


jbryant at riversideca.gov




--
Malcolm L. McCallum
Managing Editor,
Herpetological Conservation and Biology

1880's: "There's lots of good fish in the sea"  W.S. Gilbert
1990's:  Many fish stocks depleted due to overfishing, habitat loss,
            and pollution.
2000:  Marine reserves, ecosystem restoration, and pollution reduction
          MAY help restore populations.
2022: Soylent Green is People!

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and
destroy all copies of the original message.



More information about the Nhcoll-l mailing list