[Nhcoll-l] Accession of rare photo records

[Curtis Schmidt]

Lance,


What kept the individual from collecting the non-native species in the first place? I would certainly caution against cataloging an unverifiable photograph because, as you mention, it promotes bad science and poor quality data. It would be different if it was an endangered species, but I see a photograph of very little value in this particular situation. I personally am an advocate of not publishing records based on photographs unless the animals are protected. This is becoming an all too common practice that is irresponsible IMHO. I hope this helps.


Curtis

_________________________________


Curtis J. Schmidt

    Zoological Collections Manager

    Sternberg Museum of Natural History


    Instructor

    Department of Biological Sciences

    Fort Hays State University


    3000 Sternberg Drive

    Hays, KS  67601

    785-650-2447 (cell)

________________________________

________________________________
From: Nhcoll-l <nhcoll-l-bounces at mailman.yale.edu> on behalf of Lance McBrayer <lancemcbrayer at georgiasouthern.edu>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 3:21:24 PM
To: nhcoll-l at mailman.yale.edu
Subject: [Nhcoll-l] Accession of rare photo records

All

I curate a herpetology collection of about 35,000 specimens, almost all of which are actual specimens. However, I also take definitive photographs such that there is little to no question about the species in the photograph. I am aware of the debate on the value of photographic records, but I've come into an interesting situation.

Recently, a collector I do not know asked to voucher a photograph of an invasive species of tropical frog that is established in Florida, and now Georgia and several other states.  Yet this record is from Massachusetts.  Furthermore, the specimen was photographed in a potted plant in a national chain store of lumber and hardware...in February of 2018.

Clearly the frog was brought there in or on the plant(s). But as such, this record is potentially valuable. This tropical frog species is very likely to have died in the harsh MA winter....but it does well cohabitating with humans...so maybe not. And the store is literally next to a major river. So, if it does survive and disperse, it could move lots of places quickly.

I have contacted four other very knowledgeable herpetologists to confirm my identification, and that of the collector. We all agree it "looks like" the same species; i.e. all five of us agree on the identification.

To accession, or not to accession?  How do we balance the risk of preserving high quality data while at the same documenting potentially important events like this?

Thanks for your insights.
lm

--
Lance D. McBrayer
Associate Dean of Faculty & Research Programs
College of Science and Mathematics
Georgia Southern University
TEL: 912.478.5111
Webpage<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__sites.google.com_a_georgiasouthern.edu_lance-2Dd-2Dmcbrayer_&d=DwMFaQ&c=cjytLXgP8ixuoHflwc-poQ&r=LpYc_Z_iN1KRw0hheb3x6-8MJUMu482qfHowpGYJqwc&m=X8OZAEBTE3DbHbmuWdsqg9AShDNGf1EHZQbvVr2zrm8&s=nrFiBYQ9akOJWFB-DdBiohFzLRZa6tB2IYJPTWTiE1k&e=>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.yale.edu/pipermail/nhcoll-l/attachments/20180521/7c067117/attachment.html>