[Nhcoll-l] Test for formalin

Thu May 28 21:09:07 EDT 2020

Hi All

The paper test suggested by Dries and the NIWA test with marker, which
bleeds in alcohol, are great because they are quick and simple – but they
do not give quantitative results of how much formalin/formaldehyde is in
the fluid preservative, nor the concentration of the alcohol solution. For
your purposes Mandy, this may not be necessary, but I thought I would share
some methods for quantitatively determining formalin/formaldehyde
concentration in case anyone else on the list-serv is also looking for
methods.

For testing alcohol concentration, a digital density meter is really the
most effective method. However, this is a very costly piece of equipment
and many organisations do not have budget to buy one. A hydrometer can be
used if you have sufficient fluid volume. I have refined a method,
initially published by Theresa Mayfield, that uses salts (potassium
carbonate and sodium chloride) to distinguish between ethanol, isopropanol
and aqueous solutions (formalin). It requires a 2-4ml sample of fluid and
can give a good indication of alcohol concentration. As highlighted by Rob,
this is not a test for the presence of formalin, but rather just that the
solution is aqueous or an alcohol with water combination. This method is
awaiting peer review, but if anyone has any queries please get in touch and
I would be happy to share my research.

To determine the amount of formaldehyde/formalin in solution there are
several methods available. I have tested three commercially available
methods, and a titration method to determine formalin concentration
initially developed by Rob Waller and refined (very slightly) by myself. In
testing these different methods, comparisons and assessments about the
advantages and disadvantages of each method were made.

One of the first challenges is getting your head around the terminology we
use when describing formalin, and this seems to vary between countries and
institutions. What we often call “10% formalin” is actually a dilution
factor, from diluting a 1 part 100% formalin stock solution with 9 parts
water. This 100% formalin stock solution is 37% by weight or 40% by volume
formaldehyde gas in water. This means that “10% formalin” is 3.7% (w/w) or
4% (w/v) formaldehyde gas in water, which is 40,000 mg/L formaldehyde.

The titration method, has the best resolution of the methods tested, only
needs to be conducted once without the need for multiple dilutions, also
gives results for titratable acidity, and has a small sample size of
0.75ml. Due to the costs of equipment set up and materials for analysis,
this would be a good method for institutions who want to quantify the
amount of formalin/formaldehyde in solution in fluid preservatives and were
aiming to conduct many tests, which would reduce the overall cost per
test.The paper that details the titration method and comparison to the
commercially available methods, is also currently awaiting peer review, to
be published later this year in Collection Forum.

Two types of commercially available formaldehyde test strips were tested
(MQuant and Quantofix), and these give semi-quantitative results. As
discussed on the listserv previously, these test strips can be very
challenging to use and require significant dilution and calculations to get
accurate results. They measure in the range of 0mg/L to 100mg/L or 200mg/L.
“10% formalin” (4% w/v formaldehyde gas in water) is 40,000mg/L so to get
results in the range that the test strips can read dilutions up to 1:1000
may need to be made. This can be time consuming and costly as often more
that one test strip and dilution are required to get a result within the
test strips range.

A commercially available titration test kit, which uses the same chemical
reaction as the titration method above, was also tested (Hach Formaldehyde
Test Kit: Model FM-1). This can test formaldehyde concentration in solution
within the ranges of either 0.05 - 1% or 0.5% - 10% formaldehyde in
solution (here is where terminology is important – what we often call “10%
formalin” is 4% w/v formaldehyde gas in water).

The solid reagent supplied with this test kit is insoluble in ethanol,
which is an issue when testing for residual formalin in alcohol solutions.
When I tested ethanol solutions, I first dissolved the contents of the
reagent sachet in 10ml demineralised water and added that to the sample
before titration. Even though the sample was diluted the drops of titrant
were still counted as though each drop represented 0.05% formaldehyde.

The resolution of the results with this commercially available method is
not as great as the titration method above, and the sample size for the
tests is significantly larger (1ml or 10ml), however it is a simple to use
method and all the required materials are supplied. I would recommend for
people wanting to use this method to contact the supplier when ordering and
request for a lid for the test vial, to avoid spills when mixing the solid
reagent with the fluid preservative sample using the manufacturer's
published method.

Methods to test fluid preservatives need a lot more research, and this will
enable us to have a greater understanding of the fluid chemistry and the
impacts on specimens long-term preservation.

>From a health and safety perspective it is important for us to quantify how
much formaldehyde is in solution in fluid preservatives, be it from
preservation in formalin or residual in alcohol preservatives from initial
fixation in formalin.

If anyone would like more information about any of these methods, they will
hopefully be published later this year, but in the meantime I would be
happy to discuss them with you – please get in touch!

All the best,

Irene Finkelde

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 7:51 AM Hawks, Catharine <HawksC at si.edu> wrote:

> Am hoping that Irene will be able to respond - her work on this issue has
> been phenomenal and is soon to be published.
> Sent from my iPhone
> Catharine Hawks
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Nhcoll-l <nhcoll-l-bounces at mailman.yale.edu> on behalf of Mandy
> Reid <Mandy.Reid at austmus.gov.au>
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 28, 2020 5:40 PM
> *To:* Robert Waller; nhcoll-l at mailman.yale.edu
> *Subject:* [Nhcoll-l] Test for formalin
>
>
> *External Email - Exercise Caution*
>
> Thanks Rob
>
> You are absolutely right and I agree this is a very important distinction.
> I hope you don’t mind that I have copied it to the broader mailing list but
> kept the header so it is linked to the previous comments.
>
> Cheers
>
> Mandy
>
>
>
> Dr Mandy Reid
>
>
>
> Collection Manager, Malacology | Australian Museum Research Institute
>
> Australian Museum  1 William Street Sydney NSW 2010 Australia
>
> *T* 61 2 9320 6412 | *M* 61 431 829 842 | *F* 61 2 9320 6253
>
>
>
>
>
> Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube
>
>
>
> The Australian Museum acknowledges the traditional custodians of the land
> and waterways on which the Museum is located, the Gadigal People of the
> Eora Nation. The Museum aspires to celebrate, educate and preserve the
> diverse natural history and cultures of Aboriginal and Torres Strait
> Islander People.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Robert Waller <rw at protectheritage.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, 29 May 2020 3:53 AM
> *To:* Mandy Reid <Mandy.Reid at austmus.gov.au>
> *Subject:* RE: Test for formalin
>
>
>
> Hi Mandy,
>
> That may be completely adequate for your needs but from a health and
> safety perspective we should recognize this is not a test for the absence
> of formalin but, rather, for the presence of alcohol. In that sense, it
> should not be thought of as a “test for formalin” but a “test for alcohol”
> with the understanding that the alcohol may or may not also have a
> significant concentration of formalin. Again, that may not be important in
> your application but we always do well to ensure terminology does not lead
> to misunderstandings.
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> *From:* Nhcoll-l <nhcoll-l-bounces at mailman.yale.edu> *On Behalf Of *Mandy
> Reid
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 28, 2020 2:21 AM
> *To:* nhcoll-l at mailman.yale.edu
> *Subject:* [Nhcoll-l] Test for formalin
>
>
>
> Thank you to all the people who responded regarding testing for formalin
> when you are unsure whether a specimen is stored in ethanol or formalin
> (particularly problematic in historic museum specimens). I had an excellent
> idea sent to me by colleagues from NIWA (The National Institute of Water
> and Atmospheric Research in Wellington, New Zealand) that I would like to
> share. It is very simple, very inexpensive and it is very effective.
>
>
>
> Simply draw a line of permanent marker on a strip of wet label paper.
> Dipped into a formalin solution, the marker stays intact. Dipped into an
> into an ethanol solution the marker starts running, or bleeding into the
> paper.
>
>
>
> I tried it and it works perfectly. I have attached an image.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Mandy
>
> Dr Mandy Reid
>
>
>
> Collection Manager, Malacology | Australian Museum Research Institute
>
> Australian Museum  1 William Street Sydney NSW 2010 Australia
>
> *T* 61 2 9320 6412 | *M* 61 431 829 842 | *F* 61 2 9320 6253
>
>
>
>
>
> Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | YouTube
>
>
>
> The Australian Museum acknowledges the traditional custodians of the land
> and waterways on which the Museum is located, the Gadigal People of the
> Eora Nation. The Museum aspires to celebrate, educate and preserve the
> diverse natural history and cultures of Aboriginal and Torres Strait
> Islander People.
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: Image removed by sender.]
> <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.proofpoint.com%2Fv2%2Furl%3Fu%3Dhttps-3A__australianmuseum.net.au_project-2Ddiscover%26d%3DDwMFAg%26c%3DUDk80sNTkE1d7izd_F57bQ%26r%3DDslgpebAF2tv-iPFyXVp_O9cWGmIw7gDuxhDYDyULzQ%26m%3D13EWHLJl8U6AdBSVhnZiXIk4qTlqKV9ijypP1anOcPQ%26s%3D5kTckCTd9dAqQpjQygroZChSpCZtIp6RKqBP8G1sR2w%26e%3D&data=02%7C01%7Chawksc%40si.edu%7Cd79d9813f83547ef065208d8034fb36b%7C989b5e2a14e44efe93b78cdd5fc5d11c%7C0%7C0%7C637262988154048211&sdata=5Ag9y%2Fu8k1526VBNa2gc3Nikrlr8t6nbhswZGQ4uekQ%3D&reserved=0>
>
> The Australian Museum email disclaimer
>
> The views in this email are those of the user and do not necessarily
> reflect the views of the Australian Museum. The information contained in
> this email message and any accompanying files is or may be confidential and
> is for the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient,
> any use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this
> email or any attached files is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. The Australian Museum
> does not guarantee the accuracy of any information contained in this e-mail
> or attached files. As Internet communications are not secure, the
> Australian Museum does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of
> this message or attached files.
>
>
> <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faustralianmuseum.net.au%2Fproject-discover&data=02%7C01%7Chawksc%40si.edu%7Cd79d9813f83547ef065208d8034fb36b%7C989b5e2a14e44efe93b78cdd5fc5d11c%7C0%7C0%7C637262988154048211&sdata=xXPThubRG4kaqWLrZHr%2BbTnvTHdLN4p1%2F8LXttNvJqE%3D&reserved=0>
>
> The Australian Museum email disclaimer
>
> The views in this email are those of the user and do not necessarily
> reflect the views of the Australian Museum. The information contained in
> this email message and any accompanying files is or may be confidential and
> is for the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient,
> any use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this
> email or any attached files is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please delete it and notify the sender. The Australian Museum
> does not guarantee the accuracy of any information contained in this e-mail
> or attached files. As Internet communications are not secure, the
> Australian Museum does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of
> this message or attached files.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.yale.edu/pipermail/nhcoll-l/attachments/20200529/fe2be6f4/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4897 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.yale.edu/pipermail/nhcoll-l/attachments/20200529/fe2be6f4/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1344 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.yale.edu/pipermail/nhcoll-l/attachments/20200529/fe2be6f4/attachment-0001.jpg>