[Nhcoll-l] Fwd: Shelf depth for EtOH jar collections
Callomon,Paul
prc44 at drexel.edu
Wed Feb 15 13:58:39 EST 2023
________________________________
From: Callomon,Paul
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 1:07:55 PM
To: John E Simmons <simmons.johne at gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [Nhcoll-l] Shelf depth for EtOH jar collections
To John’s first point – a metal tray system solves all the problems of shelf depth. You don’t reach in to pull up and look at containers behind the first row, you pull the tray out instead. As long as you only have a maximum of two rows of containers, you can eyeball everything instantly for condition, fully addressing the point he makes about planning for maintenance cycles.
Sadly, the recent Fluid-preserved Biological Collections book did not mention these systems at all, despite our design and its advantages having been published by SPNHC.
As for collection density, fire-rated space in existing buildings is expensive to create and rarely possible to expand. Like it or not, to stay in code you often have to find ways to fit more into an existing space. We did that, in the form of a cheap and practicable upgrade to existing shelving of any kind.
Paul Callomon
Collection Manager, Malacology and General Invertebrates
________________________________
Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University
1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia PA 19103-1195, USA
prc44 at drexel.edu<mailto:prc44 at drexel.edu> Tel 215-405-5096 - Fax 215-299-1170
From: Nhcoll-l <nhcoll-l-bounces at mailman.yale.edu> On Behalf Of John E Simmons
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 11:07 AM
To: Dirk Neumann <d.neumann at leibniz-lib.de>
Cc: nhcoll-l at mailman.yale.edu
Subject: Re: [Nhcoll-l] Shelf depth for EtOH jar collections
External.
The advice offered so far on this thread is excellent, particularly the idea of abandoning systematic arrangements. There are two other points in support of the advice that has already been offered that should be mentioned:
1-Deeper shelves do allow storage of collections in dense arrangements (assuming the containers are appropriately sized) but dense storage is a negative, not a positive. Yes, it saves a bit of space, but what is sacrificed is the ability to monitor the condition of the containers and specimens. The ideal arrangement would be shelves with only one row of jars because with that arrangement specimens and fluid level and color could immediately be seen, enabling the correction of developing problems, particularly loss of fluid. However, shelving with just one row of jars is not practical, so the question becomes how many rows of jars is practical? With two or more rows the jars in front must be moved to see the jars in back, which takes additional time and also, each time a jar is picked up and moved, it increases the risk of either compromising the container seal or getting the containers out of order. With deep shelves, so that the containers are several rows deep, the time spent monitoring the collection (checking for problems) increases enormously. In my experience, the time (and therefore the cost) of monitoring collections is rarely considered when planning collection storage, which is foolish. A fluid collection needs to be inspected regularly to avoid problems.
2-Systematic arrangements are false in the sense that they are not phylogenetic arrangements (nobody has branching shelving). What systematic arrangements do is simply re-create the linear scala naturae of Aristotle, using scientific names. The arguments that this allows for better exploration of the collection, etc., are silly. And as Paul points out, containers should not be opened in the collection storage room to examine specimens. Systematic arrangements made sense when collections were smaller, space was available, and scientific names were more stable. In a world of rapidly changing systematic arrangements, we should make good use of electronic databases to both bear the current name of species and to serve as a finding aid for containers, and arrange storage to efficiently store specimens in a stable environment on storage furniture designed to accommodate efficient monitoring of specimens and containers.
--John
John E. Simmons
Writer and Museum Consultant
Museologica
and
Associate Curator of Collections
Earth and Mineral Science Museum & Art Gallery
Penn State University
and
Investigador Asociado, Departamento de Ornitologia
Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 2:15 AM Dirk Neumann <d.neumann at leibniz-lib.de<mailto:d.neumann at leibniz-lib.de>> wrote:
Hi Tonya,
we recommend in our book<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.universityproducts.com%2Fbest-practices-in-the-preservation-and-management.html&data=05%7C01%7Cprc44%40drexel.edu%7C994c64a40a6444ca83ac08db0f6ec711%7C3664e6fa47bd45a696708c4f080f8ca6%7C0%7C0%7C638120740696225756%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=HPZCZiRjw8uE0jX7UaucCB9wRq13REBOYCxiTxvwN5c%3D&reserved=0> (p. 94) to prefer 300 mm deep shelves. You can do deeper shelves (in Munich we had 450 mm), but this doesn't save space, as you cannot place more large jars on such such shelves.
Usually, large glass cylinders are rarely deeper than 300 mm. If there are larger containers, it might be worth considering 1 isle with deeper shelves (e.g., 450 mm) for these jars, or to arrange all large jars on special heavy duty shelves, as for example in the tank room at the NHM in London.
If you choose 440 mm deep shelves for the entire collection, you increase the required staff time for monitoring and maintenance, because usually the number of small jars is much higher, and there is a tendency that small jars are crowding on deeper shelves as the offer more space. Visual inspection of such densely packed shelves however needs more time. If staff time is a critical variable, 300 mm would be preferable.
Another point worth considering: deep shelves usually require wider isles and operating areas. This may not be intuitive right from the start, but you need to reach deeper into the (crowded) shelf. If the isle is as narrow as it would be for a 300 mm deep shelf, the risk to knock other jars is higher.
If available space in the new storage room is not the limiting factor, I would choose 300 mm deep shelves.
Hope this helps
Dirk
Am 15.02.2023 um 04:26 schrieb Haff, Tonya (NCMI, Crace):
Hi again everyone,
We are getting down to the pointy bit of having to confirm the desired depth of shelving for our new ethanol vault storage. Right now our shelves are only about 300mm deep, which is really not deep enough for some larger containers. We have specified 440mm deep shelving for the new space, but before pushing ‘go’ I thought I would ask if any of you have thoughts or very strong opinions about optimal shelf depth for storing jars of various sizes and smaller drums.
Thanks in advance for your input!
Cheers,
Tonya
-------------------------------------------------
Dr. Tonya M. Haff
Collection Manager
Australian National Wildlife Collection
CSIRO
+61(0)419569109
https://www.csiro.au/en/about/facilities-collections/collections/anwc<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.csiro.au%2Fen%2Fabout%2Ffacilities-collections%2Fcollections%2Fanwc&data=05%7C01%7Cprc44%40drexel.edu%7C994c64a40a6444ca83ac08db0f6ec711%7C3664e6fa47bd45a696708c4f080f8ca6%7C0%7C0%7C638120740696225756%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=k5e2zFZ4XDjKx96Bver5A0M6mdNQ4CTvNVi0aPPC4nM%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________
Nhcoll-l mailing list
Nhcoll-l at mailman.yale.edu<mailto:Nhcoll-l at mailman.yale.edu>
https://mailman.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/nhcoll-l<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailman.yale.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnhcoll-l&data=05%7C01%7Cprc44%40drexel.edu%7C994c64a40a6444ca83ac08db0f6ec711%7C3664e6fa47bd45a696708c4f080f8ca6%7C0%7C0%7C638120740696225756%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=GBXkdjGjJveZSTDsi8N6Q31QnVmG7EQFxfPmRkEwUVg%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________
NHCOLL-L is brought to you by the Society for the Preservation of
Natural History Collections (SPNHC), an international society whose
mission is to improve the preservation, conservation and management of
natural history collections to ensure their continuing value to
society. See http://www.spnhc.org<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.spnhc.org%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cprc44%40drexel.edu%7C994c64a40a6444ca83ac08db0f6ec711%7C3664e6fa47bd45a696708c4f080f8ca6%7C0%7C0%7C638120740696225756%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2F%2FrnjmAFUNF7CbhMYQ8Ty3mbZfBgCvHN3QcFh5t%2BsKk%3D&reserved=0> for membership information.
Advertising on NH-COLL-L is inappropriate.
--
****
Dirk Neumann
Collection Manager, Hamburg
Postal address:
Museum of Nature Hamburg
Leibniz Institute for the Analysis
of Biodiversity Change
Dirk Neumann
Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3
20146 Hamburg
+49 40 238 317 – 628
d.neumann at leibniz-lib.de<mailto:d.neumann at leibniz-lib.de>
www.leibniz-lib.de<http://www.leibniz-lib.de>
--
Stiftung Leibniz-Institut zur Analyse des Biodiversitätswandels
Postanschrift: Adenauerallee 127, 53113 Bonn, Germany
Stiftung des öffentlichen Rechts;
Generaldirektion: Prof. Dr. Bernhard Misof (Generaldirektor), Adrian Grüter (Kaufm. Geschäftsführer)
Sitz der Stiftung: Adenauerallee 160 in Bonn
Vorsitzender des Stiftungsrates: Dr. Michael Wappelhorst
--
Stiftung Leibniz-Institut zur Analyse des Biodiversitätswandels
Postanschrift: Adenauerallee 127, 53113 Bonn, Germany
Stiftung des öffentlichen Rechts;
Generaldirektion: Prof. Dr. Bernhard Misof (Generaldirektor), Adrian Grüter (Kaufm. Geschäftsführer)
Sitz der Stiftung: Adenauerallee 160 in Bonn
Vorsitzender des Stiftungsrates: Dr. Michael Wappelhorst
_______________________________________________
Nhcoll-l mailing list
Nhcoll-l at mailman.yale.edu<mailto:Nhcoll-l at mailman.yale.edu>
https://mailman.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/nhcoll-l<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailman.yale.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fnhcoll-l&data=05%7C01%7Cprc44%40drexel.edu%7C994c64a40a6444ca83ac08db0f6ec711%7C3664e6fa47bd45a696708c4f080f8ca6%7C0%7C0%7C638120740696225756%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=GBXkdjGjJveZSTDsi8N6Q31QnVmG7EQFxfPmRkEwUVg%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________
NHCOLL-L is brought to you by the Society for the Preservation of
Natural History Collections (SPNHC), an international society whose
mission is to improve the preservation, conservation and management of
natural history collections to ensure their continuing value to
society. See http://www.spnhc.org<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.spnhc.org%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cprc44%40drexel.edu%7C994c64a40a6444ca83ac08db0f6ec711%7C3664e6fa47bd45a696708c4f080f8ca6%7C0%7C0%7C638120740696225756%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2F%2FrnjmAFUNF7CbhMYQ8Ty3mbZfBgCvHN3QcFh5t%2BsKk%3D&reserved=0> for membership information.
Advertising on NH-COLL-L is inappropriate.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.yale.edu/pipermail/nhcoll-l/attachments/20230215/920831f3/attachment.html>
More information about the Nhcoll-l
mailing list