[yul-naco] RDA NACO records for review

[Arakawa, Steven]

Found another one: Joseph Ratzinger to Benedict XVI; ARN does not change if you look it up in OCLC : AuthoritiesàShowàLC Superseded versions
And another: Arquette, Courteney Cox <if she divorces, probably goes back to her nne name.

Steven Arakawa
Catalog Librarian for Training & Documentation
Catalog & Metadata Services, SML, Yale University
P.O. Box 208240 New Haven, CT 06520-8240
(203)432-8286 steven.arakawa at yale.edu

From: yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu [mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Griem, Rowena
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 3:03 PM
To: yul-naco at mailman.yale.edu
Subject: [yul-naco] RDA NACO records for review

#4           Wachowski, Lana, 1965-
(please see the discussion with Rick below)

#37         Schweizer Alpenclub. Sektion Lägern

#3           Wegmarken


From: Sarcia, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 11:38 AM
To: Griem, Rowena
Subject: RE: NACO question on sexual reassignment

Thanks Rowena.
... Not sure if you need the $t in the second 375 but I guess you can toss that out there for debate.

--Rick

From: Griem, Rowena
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 3:37 PM
To: Sarcia, Richard
Subject: RE: NACO question on sexual reassignment

This is what I have so far:

Wachowski, Lana, ǂd 1965-         save file #4

Rowena
From: Sarcia, Richard
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 12:43 PM
To: Griem, Rowena
Subject: RE: NACO question on sexual reassignment

Hi Rowena— You have to create a new record that includes a 4XX for the earlier established form (it has a “$w nne” in it), and then the older heading will be deleted, or at least that was the AACR2 practice, so I’ll have to poke around in RDA and make sure that hasn’t changed. BFM will be required on anything published using the earlier name. If you want to see a couple of examples look at the authority records for Morris, Jan, 1926- and Boylan, Jennifer Finney, 1958-.

I believe you’d use multiple 375’s to denote gender and date, using the terms male and female, with a birth year in $s for the first one, if available, and the year, or estimated year, the person began identifying as female in $s of the second 375.

I’ll double check on all of the above for you. Thanks.

--Rick

From: Griem, Rowena
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 10:53 AM
To: Sarcia, Richard
Subject: RE: NACO question on sexual reassignment

PS  Per the instruction, I guess it would be “transsexual woman.”
Rowena

From: Griem, Rowena
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 10:51 AM
To: 'Sarcia, Richard' (richard.sarcia at yale.edu<mailto:richard.sarcia at yale.edu>)
Subject: NACO question on sexual reassignment

I came across a case where the person has undergone male to female sexual reassignment surgery and now goes by a new name. Their latest work is completed but not yet released, and they are using the new name in their advertising.

I thought this would make an interesting RDA practice record, but an AACR2 authority record exists for their original name. Do I just add 400s for their new full name & nickname? Or does the new name go into the 100? (which seems wrong somehow, since their earlier works were released under the male name). Or do I create a new record for the “new” person with cross refs to the male name? (which may be problematic since I do not yet have the new work in hand).

If I can create a new record, can it be in RDA? If so, what would the correct term be in the 375? The instruction says “gender with which a person identifies” which suggests it should simply be “woman” with  an explanation in the comments. Or should the 375 specify that they are transgender?

Rowena

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.yale.edu/pipermail/yul-naco/attachments/20120802/94d90e8c/attachment-0001.html