[yul-naco] RDA NACO heading list #2
Young, Stephen
stephen.young at yale.edu
Tue Sep 4 15:32:50 EDT 2012
Now I get it! I think you could simply have updated the coding and 040 without adding all the new optional special fields. It’s nice that you’ve done that, but when we really get into this, I don’t think we’ll have the time luxury of doing all that because there will be so many headings to re-evaluate. Great for training now however.
Stephen Y.
From: yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu [mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Bourassa, Dominique
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 3:14 PM
To: Distribution list for YUL NACO catalogers
Subject: Re: [yul-naco] RDA NACO heading list #2
Stephen,
Thanks for your comments. To answer your question about 84 Gourévitch, Jean-Paul, 1941-
Looks O.K. But why does 040 have all the DLCs and no CtYs?
This is one of these records that need to be updated. If you look in the authority file, you will see that it says: “667 THIS 1XX FIELD CANNOT BE USED UNDER RDA UNTIL THIS RECORD HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND/OR UPDATED.”
Dominique
From: yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu [mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Young, Stephen
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 1:58 PM
To: Distribution list for YUL NACO catalogers
Subject: Re: [yul-naco] RDA NACO heading list #2
The first ten records were done by me, so I will refrain from commenting on them. Comments on the others below.
Stephen Young
From: yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu<mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu> [mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu]<mailto:[mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu]> On Behalf Of Sarcia, Richard
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 4:29 PM
To: yul-naco at mailman.yale.edu<mailto:yul-naco at mailman.yale.edu>
Subject: [yul-naco] RDA NACO heading list #2
Hi all— The next batch of headings to be sent to LC for review following any comments/suggestions and/or updates. Thanks.
--Rick
______
13 D'Orsi, Angela, 17th century
61 Francesco, cieco Veronese
374 gave Verona, Italy in subfield f, because "veronese" could mean either born in or inhabitant of Verona
74 Guerrini, Francesco, 1600 or 1601-1651 Repeated 046 because of different schemas
69 Guglielmi, Francesco, 17th century
71 Infiammato, 16th century 373 Gave NACO form, as 670/2 didn’t give name of the academy
72 Livio, Lucio
76 Lombardo, Giovanni Donato
Question: In 374 there are 2 occupations. Should there be separating punctuation other than an additional subfields?
81 Martinengo, Giovanni Battista, 1589-1630
83 Martini, Giovanni Simone, 16th/17th century
88 Bagolino, Antonio
75 Berger, Stephanie ǂq (Stephanie A.)
Looks O.K. But is it better to repeat 374, or simply repeat subfield a when the subfield 2 applies to both?
80 dancing girl press
110 and 410 – Is this non-standardized capitalization permissible in access points?
86 Sandidge, Ernie, 1966-
Looks O.K.
62 Bromet-Camou, Michèle, 1948-
374 Shouldn’t the terms be separated by an additional subfield a? Otherwise looks O.K.
63 Jacquet-Smailovic, Murielle
Looks O.K.
68 Ponsard, Christine, 1957-2004
670/2 – Death date typo “2012”? Otherwise looks O.K.
78 Brigitte-Ballesio, Corinne
670 It looks like there’s some kind of extraneous character following the date. Otherwise looks O.K.
82 Chaizemartin, Julie, 1984-
Looks O.K.
84 Gourévitch, Jean-Paul, 1941-
Looks O.K. But why does 040 have all the DLCs and no CtYs?
77 Vivicorsi, Bruno
Looks O.K.
90 Montelongo Franquiz, Antonio Jesús
372 Is a place (Canary Islands) considered a field of activity? Otherwise looks O.K.
91 Falero Lemes, Marcial Alexis
372 Is a place (Canary Islands) considered a field of activity? Otherwise looks O.K.
92 Lebanese International Airways
Looks O.K.
23 Thalib, Ridwan (data only on t.p.)
Looks O.K.
99 Rasman Saridin, ‡d 1966-
Looks O.K.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.yale.edu/pipermail/yul-naco/attachments/20120904/a4bcc654/attachment.html
More information about the YUL-NACO
mailing list