P.sennae

John Grehan jrg13 at psu.edu
Tue Sep 8 15:35:29 EDT 1998


In response to Bridget Becker who comments:

>I'm new to this list. I'm not a scientist. I just love butterflies. In
>response to
>A lack of "empirical" evidence regarding the function of wings, they clearly
>serve a purpose. Pollination, for one. I don't know of too many pollinating
>creatures that don't have wings.

Wings may enable pollination by butterflies, but that does not mean that is
their
purpose. Of course if one were to believe that wings have a purpose, and that
pollination or dispersal is that purpose, I could not demonstrate otherwise, but
I could not empirically  demonstrate any purpose since purpose involves
goal directed
 origins (i.e. the behaviour or morphology comes into existence to meet a
future need).
As far as I am aware, there is no empirical evidence to suggest that organisms,
behaviours, morphology etc evolve this way.

>Perhaps they also serve as camouflage, looking like flower petals. Anyway, I
>know one purpose served by butterfly wings. They add beauty to the world -
>I'm sure there's no empirical evidence of that , either.

I agree would agree with Bridget that there is no empirical evidence, so I
cannot
agree or disagree that the addition of beauty into the world is one purpose
served by
butterfly wings, only that this lies outside my empirical experience.

John Grehan



More information about the Leps-l mailing list