Science and creationism

[Sunsol Daniels]

>Thus, they will cavalierly dismiss any serious consideration of 
evolution with a backhanded
>aside (often tinged with dismissive humor).  Sally Daniels recent 
(totally uninformed) post was
>of this same ilk.\

It's not that I dismiss any serious consideration of evolution. But 
perhaps you dismiss any serious consideration of other possibilities. I 
think evolution is the best we have, but it isn't near good enough. In 
other areas of science, the "theories" seem much closer to fact and much 
more easily proven. Evolution just isn't very robust in my book.

Sally