chemical safety during preparation
Michael Gochfeld
gochfeld at eohsi.rutgers.edu
Fri Nov 12 08:47:58 EST 1999
It don't know much about genitalia but I do deal with chemical
safety. The interesting post on techniques includes mention of xylene,
euparal, and cellosolve.
------------------------------excerpt from original message----------
"Main exceptions are the substitution of Xylene with 95-100% Isopropyl
alcohol, and the substitution of Canada Balsam with Euparal (avail from
Bioquip, as is the Cellosolve). Only drawback with these substitutions
is that Euparal takes far far longer to dry, and slides must be kept
flat for months. Plus side is that it is far less carcinogenic than
xylene."
-------------------------end of original message---------------
I was somewhat confused as to exactly what is substituted for which,
since it seems that the tradeoff is between Euparal (long-drying) and
"xylene" (toxic).
Nonetheless, I should point out that although xylene is toxic to the
nervous system, it is not currently classified as a carcinogen (see
documentation below) and if future research should detect
carcinogenicity, it is certainly not a potent carcinogen, since cancer
has not turned up in any studies of xylene in humans thus far. However,
it is toxic and needs to be treated with respect. Perhaps the confusion
lies in the fact that industrial grade xylene may have a trace of
unreacted benzene, which is indeed a carcinogen (leukemia). However, the
metabolism of xylene (dimethyl-benzene) does not go through benzene, but
rather to hippuric acid which is excreted by the kidney.
On the other hand cellosolve is also quite toxic and absorbable through
the skin. Cellosolve has lower volatility than xylene, but is not
appreciably less toxic to the nervous system. And it is somewhat
volatile (it is a derivative of ethylene glycol which is a common
antifreeze). At very high doses it is toxic to the kidney. This would
not affect entomology users, but would be a hazard if a small child took
a swig from an open bottle.
Good ventilation and care in handling are important for ALL of these
materials.
========XYLENE AND CANCER
Information from EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS)
___II.A.1. WEIGHT-OF-EVIDENCE CLASSIFICATION
Classification -- D; not classifiable as to human carcinogenicity.
Basis -- Orally administered technical xylene mixtures did not result
in significant increases in incidences in tumor responses in rats or
mice of both sexes.
___II.A.2. HUMAN CARCINOGENICITY DATA
None.
___II.A.3. ANIMAL CARCINOGENICITY DATA
Inadequate.
___II.A.4. SUPPORTING DATA FOR CARCINOGENICITY
The frequency of sister chromatid exchanges and chromosomal
aberrations were nearly identical between a group of 17 paint industry
workers exposed to xylene and their respective referents (Haglund et
al., 1980). In vitro, xylene caused no increase in the number of
sister chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes (Gerner-Smidt and
Friedrich, 1978). Studies indicate that xylene isomers, technical grade
xylene or mixed xylene are not mutagenic in tests with Salmonella
typhimurium (Florin et al., 1980; NTP, 1986; Bos et al., 1981)
nor in mutant reversion assays with Escherichia coli (McCarroll et
al., 1981).
Technical grade xylene, but not o- and m-xylene, was weakly mutagenic
in Drosophila recessive lethal tests. Chromosomal aberrations were
not increased in bone marrow cells of rats exposed to xylenes by
inhalation (Donner et al., 1980).
__II.B. QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATE OF CARCINOGENIC RISK FROM ORAL EXPOSURE
Not available.
__II.C. QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATE OF CARCINOGENIC RISK FROM INHALATION
EXPOSURE
Not available.
To see for yourself
for XYLENE: http://www.epa.gov/ngispgm3/iris/subst/0270.htm#II.
For the entire data base: http://www.epa.gov/ngispgm3/iris/index.html
Mike Gochfeld
=============================================================
Michael Gochfeld, MD PhD
Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute
170 Frelinghuysen Road
Piscataway, NJ 08854
gochfeld at eohsi.rutgers.edu
More information about the Leps-l
mailing list