Fw: If the party of the first part

Ron Gatrelle gatrelle at tils-ttr.org
Sat Oct 28 00:17:39 EDT 2000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Gatrelle" <gatrelle at tils-ttr.org>
To: "Leps-l" <Leps-l at lists.yale.edu>
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 7:33 PM
Subject: If the party of the first part

> From Guy Van de Poel writes:
> There are a lot of interesting rules in the Code, and I would suggest it
> anybody who's interested enough to join a discussion on taxonomy. It is
> written in a kind of language that reminds me of lawyers, but it probably
> needs it to make sure there are no holes 'between' the rules ...
> From Ron.
> This hits the proverbial nail on the head. The Code in not just similar to
> lawyer speak -- it is lawyer speak! Even what may have seemed simple under
> Article 33 and 34 as quoted by Guy is, in itself, based on other
> and rules which, sometimes obtusely, so intertwine with each others non
> prodigious but then which... Is anybody understanding this stuff?


   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:


More information about the Leps-l mailing list