Fw: Re: common names
Michael Gochfeld
gochfeld at eohsi.rutgers.edu
Sun Apr 22 06:19:16 EDT 2001
Padus is (was?) considered a subgenus of Prunus by some. My error. I
should have written Prunus (Padus) virginiana. RG
I don't think that form is anywhere stated. However, including a name
in [square brackets] has sometimes been used to identify members of a
superspecies.
I felt the same way when the name of the Black-capped Chickadee was
changed from Parus to Poecile. But that's only because it had been Parus
for my entire lifetime. It used to be Poecile a hundred years ago. The
50 year rule wouldn't apply, because the current name change was on
biologic grounds (generic reassignment) rather than on nomenclatorial
grounds.
With regard to whether 20% of the names have changed, that is an
artifact of how many species there are in genera or families that have
been closely scrutinized and "revised".
I still think that scientific names have more spatial stability and
common names more temporal stability (independent of how they sound and
how easy they are to learn).
Mike Gochfeld
------------------------------------------------------------
For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
More information about the Leps-l
mailing list