Population control

Michael Gochfeld gochfeld at eohsi.rutgers.edu
Fri Jan 26 00:08:13 EST 2001


this way".
Human population is, after all, the ultimate environmental hazard.  The
optimists are saying that population will level off at 10 billion or so,
not to worry.  They don't say what the levelling off is going to be due
to. Or what it will be like after the levelling.
 
Mike Gochfeld
 
 
"DR. JAMES ADAMS" wrote:
 
> Stan's message prompted me to send my one politically oriented
> message of the year:
>
>         All Stan says about human population's impact on the world
> around us is correct.  I have always held that there is one
> underlying problem in the world today that is basically responsible
> for most of the others -- human overpopulation of the world.  And to
> hear that one of George W.'s first acts after getting into office was
> to reinstigate the ban on sending family planning aid to those
> countries that use the some of the funds for abortion just makes
> me sick.  I don't care what your views are on abortion -- I know it is
> a hot topic.  But if you don't get *any* aid sent to these countries,
> with an attempt to educate and provide alternative methods of birth
> control, you simply end up with *more* people unable to fend for
> themselves and *more* abortions.  Makes me ill . . .
>
>         James
>
> Dr. James K. Adams
> Dept. of Natural Science and Math
> Dalton State College
> 213 N. College Drive
> Dalton, GA  30720
> Phone: (706)272-4427; fax: (706)272-2533
> U of Michigan's President James Angell's
>   Secret of Success: "Grow antennae, not horns"
>
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>    For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
>
>    http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
>
 
 
 
 ------------------------------------------------------------
 
   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
 
   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
 


More information about the Leps-l mailing list