Population control (not Religious content - but also read at your own risk)

Chris J. Durden drdn at mail.utexas.edu
Fri Jan 26 17:44:47 EST 2001


Exactly!
............Chris Durden
 
At 11:40 AM 1/26/2001 -0600, you wrote:
> > NON-DIRECTLY-LEPIDOPTERAN CONTENT YOU MAY WANT TO DELETE NOW.
>
>I see the phantom of the natality control by there....
>
>An important point is if we try to control the natality in "poor" country it
>never works... If the quality of life increase, then the matelity decrease
>automatically. It's absolutely not a casuality that the rich countries have
>low natality rates or negative repopulation rates, it's human, the interests
>of the people are differents, priorities are differents, studies, good job,
>good social position, house, tv, car, etc... childrens are not going in that
>sense. If I remember well, in France, the average of the first baby is 24
>years. In many "poor" countries many womens of 24 have 5, 6 or 7 childrens.
>The opportunity of a single women, 24 years, with no childrens and a
>doctorate is really higher than a single (abandonned) women, 24 years, 6
>childrens and a primary grade...
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Jean-Michel MAES
>MUSEO ENTOMOLOGICO
 
 
 
 
 ------------------------------------------------------------
 
   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
 
   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
 


More information about the Leps-l mailing list