NABA WEB SITE
John Grehan
jrg13 at psu.edu
Thu Jun 14 23:17:38 EDT 2001
>
>The choice of word "focus" in conjunction with non-consumptive is very
>important. And it is also very clear that nothing is said about
>opposing consumptive activities. It just isn't a focus.
>
>Mike Gochfeld
As someone who has no history of bashing NABA or having any involvment in
the organization or any other in the US I do find the explicit "focus" on
non-consumptive activities to be problematic. Agreed, it is not an explicit
statement of opposition to those activities, but it does make those
activities an issue with respect to NABA. I do not see how some kind of
negative connotation is involved by separating out and excluding so-called
"consumptive" activities such as collecting. It is evident from all the
discussion and range of views that there is a problem, and the problem
relates to the language and emphasis given by NABA. It seems that if NABA
did not give exclusion to particular activities in its focus then there
would not be an issue, and it seems to me that the issue will remain so
long as there is this focus.
As a separate question could someone mention why it was deemed necessary to
make 'consumptive' activities an issue. (I appreciate that the explanation
is available and I admit to not taking the time to check the web pages and
other literature given the likelihood that someone on the list will have
the information on their fingertips).
John Grehan
------------------------------------------------------------
For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
More information about the Leps-l
mailing list