[leps-talk] What Linda Rogers Really thinks!

[Paul Cherubini]

Neil Jones wrote:

> Previously when we engaged in debate she lost the argument big time. 
> Again it was a matter of logic. She knows she lost it because this is
> what she wrote. It was on an IBBA releated list when she thought 
> I would not find out. ( I have been reluctant to quote this but the 
> IBBA must know it is leaking like a sieve by now.)

Linda Rogers responds:

Hi Paul, please send this to leps and tils lists.  I responded but am not
subscriber to those lists.  Please post for me.  Thanks, Linda

----- Original Message -----
From: "Linda Rogers" <llrogers at airmail.net>
To: <tils-leps-talk at yahoogroups.com>; <neil at nwjones.demon.co.uk>
Cc: <leps-l at lists.yale.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [leps-talk] What Linda Rogers Really thinks!

I sent the post to Ed Reinertsen to put on the leps and tils list....
I WANTED this to be posted and wanted it to be seen! The first line of my 
e-mail to Ed is:

"Ed, please send this on my behalf to those lists"

So, nothing is "hidden" and there are no "leaks."  You have a screw loose.
Now, would you please stop referring to me on any and all lists?
I have stated plainly that I wish no further communication from you.
There is no science in your criticisms, no science in the article on
the NABA website about not releasing butterflies.  You attack and
belittle people when you can find nothing else.

PLEASE STOP using my name, referring to me, and if you want
to post something then stick to science.  Let's hear all of the
science-based facts about why butterflies should not be raised
for release.

Linda Rogers

 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl