[leps-talk] LEPS-L and cross posting

[Jim Taylor]

I am subscribed to both lists, and I don't view cross-posting as a problem.
Usually, the second version appears in my mail box next to the first, and a
simple click dumps it, unread, on top of the first (read). And I haven't
posted recently to either because I haven't had anything interesting to say
about bugs. However, I do have a new grandchild, and if anyone is interested
in Sam, let me know.

Jim Taylor
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Gatrelle" <gatrelle at tils-ttr.org>
To: "Jorge Bizarro" <jbizarro at uol.com.br>; <leps-l at lists.yale.edu>; "'TILS
leps talk '" <TILS-leps-talk at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: [leps-talk] LEPS-L and cross posting


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jorge Bizarro" <jbizarro at uol.com.br>
> Subject: Re: [leps-talk] LEPS-L and cross posting
>
>
> > Why not allow cross-posting for the opening of a trend, avoiding to
> > cross-post answers to it??
> >
> > At least, peeple will know whats going out on each list.
> >
> > Jorge
>
>
> Jorge, you are just too reasonable :-)  Yes, this and other approaches
> work.  Thread Announcement is a good idea.  I'd subscribe to a list serve
> that just put out a list of threads on many related list serves.  One
could
> just get in on what they wanted and let the rest pass.   It could be
called
> "Abstracts in abstracts"
>
> Ron
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------ 
>
>    For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
>
>    http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
>
>


 
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

   For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:

   http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl