Monarch Extinction press releases.

[MexicoDoug at aol.com]

Ditto those comments Stan, further, historically the archive will show I have 
more frequently than not been positive about Paul's comments, and in this 
case I felt I was defending the rigorous scientific method, and not being 
negative towards Paul, simply expressing my recurring desire for unity among 
Lepidopterists big and small-time, and encouraging Paul sit down and write a 
mainstream original peer reviewed paper for once, something I do believe he is quite 
able to do, and I bet that would be actually very welcomed by many, in spite of 
what appears to be a self-fulfilling personal pique regarding some researchers 
which I believe is counterproductive.  I further believe that many of Paul's 
contributions go unnoticed and are destined into oblivion, except for the 
label that many brand him with, and in the sense of the integrity of science would 
be a positive influence in the press.  Like when he released Monarchs around 
the continental divide to test the limits some general flight path population 
group assumptions.

Of course, I am not trying to preach anything here.  Just responding to the 
trolling after being classified as a Lep gangster when all I want to do is 
learn as much about Leps as I can in a positive environment, well one out of two 
would be good enough at this point...
Best Butterflying, Doug Dawn, Monterrey, Mexico


En un mensaje con fecha 11/13/2003 12:06:36 PM Mexico Standard Time, 
stan_gorodenski at asualumni.org escribe:

> I find it interesting that I am viewed as one of the 'gang up' gang 
> because I already said I have no position on the danger to the Monarch.
> Stan
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.yale.edu/mailman/private/leps-l/attachments/20031113/e6498b38/attachment.html