[Personal_archives] images of death
RICKBARRY at aol.com
RICKBARRY at aol.com
Wed Oct 29 23:50:50 EDT 2008
This very interesting discussion has included several comments on access and
use of photos of deceased persons taken at funerals and how attitudes have
changed in this respect in recent generations. Some comments referred to
cultural aspects as to what is considered personal or public. There can be quite
serious cultural implications of not only photos of the deceased but even the
names of deceased in some cultures and while it is common in some cultures to
include permanent pictures of the deceased on their graves, in others it is
next to taboo. Those of you dealing with personal or other records of
different societies will find it worthwhile to read Helen Onopko's presentation on
"Evolving access solutions -- repatriation of records of indigenous
communities," which is accessible in the Guest Authors section of _www.mybestdocs.com_
(http://www.mybestdocs.com) . This presentation was a report on a project to
develop and provide portable archives of Aboriginal records to the groups
that were the subject of the records, and the challenges that arose in that
process.
Quoting from Helen's presentation:
"On the one hand free accessibility to this heritage is needed so that
Aboriginal people can trace their genealogies, find their tribal identity, their
ancestral lands, and trace their relatives. On the other hand 'free' access
can go against traditional methods of control over the flow of cultural sacred
information. As recordkeeping professionals we can appreciate that here is a
special circumstance where context is as important as content.
"In July 1978, photographs by a powerful collector of aboriginal records
were printed in Stern Magazine showing sacred sites and secret rites of
indigenous groups. He was very upset when the photographs were then sold to People
Magazine. Stern subsequently apologised. The whole controversy about whether
the photographs should or should not have been published caused a great deal
of moral anguish. He said that he had every right to permit use of the
photographs because the subjects in the photographs had passed away.
"In some Aboriginal communities, seeing the names and photographs of the
deceased may cause sadness and distress, particularly to relatives of those
people.
"It is admittedly very difficult to write history without including such
names. On the Ara Irititja website, cautions are provided to users, so that
choices can be made prior to record access.
"This was placed at the beginning of the website and the warning has to be
accepted by all users to enter."
Regards,
Rick
In a message dated 10/29/2008 8:51:45 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
catherine.hobbs at lac-bac.gc.ca writes:
Judith's message brought to mind an interview with Joan Schwartz (no
doubt some of you know the programme/new item I'm referring to, but I
can't remember) where she discusses her study of 19thC portraits taken
of dead children. She discusses the way in which these portraits were
taken by studio photographers shortly after the death and how they
functioned as reminders to the Victorians who had a different sense of
memorialization.
If any of you know of an article on the topic we'll add it to the
citations relating to the discussion. (By the way, I've been meaning to
mention that: we'll be aiming to compile the citations for the
discussion).
Best,
Catherine
-----Original Message-----
From: personal_archives-bounces at mailman.yale.edu
[mailto:personal_archives-bounces at mailman.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Judith
Colwell
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 3:04 PM
To: Archives; Personal_archives at mailman.yale.edu
Subject: Re: [Personal_archives] personal archives
The photos that we have in a church archvies, amid personal papers, are
often taken to back up a report or to put a face on a church -- hence
alumninum souvenir plates and postcards showing the image of the
minister and of the church exterior. In some circles these would be art
forms -- after all the engraving on the aluminum or tin took some skill.
Then the question arises asking whether the church was as stern as the
minister, or was the minister pushing an image that he thought the
church wanted.
As to pictures of funerals, etc. -- depends on the geographic area in
question. I have some photos of people laid out in their caskets which
appear to be part of a culture. And I vividly recall, from back in the
late 1950's a schoolmate with her album of photos of her mother in
casket and the funeral. Creepy to me, but ....
Judith Colwell
**************Plan your next getaway with AOL Travel. Check out Today's Hot
5 Travel Deals!
(http://travel.aol.com/discount-travel?ncid=emlcntustrav00000001)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.yale.edu/pipermail/personal_archives/attachments/20081029/3faf7ea5/attachment.html
More information about the Personal_archives
mailing list