[Tshwanelex-l] Digraph and trigraph sorting etc.
David Joffe
david.joffe at tshwanedje.com
Fri Aug 3 13:18:19 EDT 2012
Should be within a day or two.
(Techincal notes: Our build even build product upload system is now
basically fully automated for both Windows and Mac, but while
running a full auto-build and upload of the build products takes
about 1 or 2 hours on Windows, it takes in total about 11 or 12
hours for the whole Mac building and uploading scripts to run ...
and if there is one little build error (as there was last night :/)
with the latest changes then that whole build process needs to be
started again, after fixing the error. That's why it's currently
basically impossible to always do the two immediately simultaneously
- if the Windows build works, as with last night, it doesn't make
sense for us to delay the Windows release by potentially one or more
days due to a problem on the Mac side, or vice versa. So sometimes
the Mac users unfortunately have to 'bear with us' a bit. The main
reason for the slower Mac building is simply that the compiler
software is massively slower on the Mac than on other platforms, to
the point that we're actually now in the process of also starting to
automate our Linux build environment (internally we sometimes build
on Linux too) just to help catch Mac compile errors, as actually Mac
and Linux have more in common than Mac and Windows from a build
perspective ... however, the Linux compiler systems are extremely
fast, orders of magnitude faster. So at some stage, in future
anyway, that should hopefully help us catch some of the Mac compile
issues 'quicker'.)
On 3 Aug 2012 at 11:38, Andrew Clark wrote:
From: Andrew Clark <a.a.clark at steading.org.uk>
To: David Joffe <david.joffe at tshwanedje.com>,
tshwanelex-l at mailman.yale.edu
Subject: Re: [Tshwanelex-l] Digraph and trigraph sorting
etc.
Date sent: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:38:26 +0100
> Hi David,
>
> When is an OS X build likely to be available?
>
> /A
>
> On 3 Aug 2012, at 03:41, David Joffe wrote:
>
> > Oh yes, one quick 'caveat' - if you set up digraph sorting in the
> > new version, save the file, then load the file in a pre-.653 version
> > - the file should load, but the digraph sorting won't work properly
> > anymore. (Hopefully that should be relatively obvious.)
> >
> >
> > On 3 Aug 2012 at 3:45, David Joffe wrote:
> >
> > From: "David Joffe" <david.joffe at tshwanedje.com>
> > To: tshwanelex-l at mailman.yale.edu,
> > Menan Du Plessis <menan.du.plessis at gmail.com>
> > Date sent: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 03:45:40 +0200
> > Priority: normal
> > Subject: [Tshwanelex-l] Digraph and trigraph sorting etc.
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> A test version of the (long-awaited) digraph (and trigraph etc.)
> >> supporting version of the table-based configurable sorting in TLex
> >> is now available:
> >>
> >> http://tshwanedje.com/builds/653/
> >>
> >> It would be great if it could get a little more testing before being
> >> rolled into the 'formal' build, so anyone waiting for this
> >> functionality, please give it a go. A small sample is also attached.
> >>
> >> Basically the old user interface for configuring the sorting has
> >> changed in only one way (which you can't miss): Whereas before, all
> >> variant forms where on one line, e.g.:
> >> a -> variant-forms: Aa
> >> now, the variant forms are separated by line breaks, e.g.:
> >> a -> variant-forms:
> >> A
> >> a
> >>
> >> so this allows a digraph to be entered as, for example:
> >> ch -> variant-forms:
> >> ch
> >> CH
> >> Ch
> >> cH
> >>
> >> If it's not reasonably clear let me know?
> >>
> >> Note this same system should be able to work out the box (well, with
> >> some configuration of course per dictionary etc.) not only for
> >> digraphs (or trigraphs), but also other cases where one alphabetic
> >> 'letter' may be represented by a string of 2 or more Unicode
> >> characters as a variant form - so e.g. that would include combining
> >> diacritic forms, and also non-canonical variants (that basically
> >> gmholton at alaska.edurefers to when there is more than one way in
> >> Unicode to represent the same character, e.g. e with accent can be
> >> represented, for example, either as the single precombined form:
> >> U+00e9
> >> or, slightly more unusually, as e.g. a plain latin 'e' with
> >> combining accent:
> >> U+0065 + U+0301
> >>
> >> (However, for most users compiling dictionaries, implementing that
> >> level within the sorting is not generally necessary, and can anyway
> >> be worked around in such a controlled environment. But anyway, it
> >> might be of theoretical or even practical interest to some.)
> >>
> >> - David
> >>
> >>
> >> On 17 Jul 2012 at 8:19, Menan Du Plessis wrote:
> >>
> >> Date sent: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 08:19:00 +0200
> >> From: Menan Du Plessis <menan.du.plessis at gmail.com>
> >> To: tshwanelex-l at mailman.yale.edu
> >> Subject: [Tshwanelex-l] sending sample to a 3rd party; configuring
> >> sorting
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Hi everyone.
> >>>
> >>> I need to send a sample soon to the people who run the electronic
> >>> archive (ELAR, at SOAS) where our material will be deposited. (Am
> >>> working on an extremely endangered language, with essentially one
> >>> last
> >>> speaker, who is 100 years old.) So my first urgent question is:
> >>>
> >>> Q: How do I organize my sound files plus the dictionary so that my
> >>> recipient will be able to click on the icon and hear the recorded
> >>> examples I have linked to my entries? Is there a way to put them
> >>> both
> >>> into one folder, and then specify the directory in a neutral way,
> >>> i.e.
> >>> that doesn't include a drive on my own computer as part of the
> >>> address?
> >>>
> >>> And my second urgent question is:
> >>>
> >>> Q: How do I configure the sorting where digraphs, trigraphs (and
> >>> polygraphs) need to be accommodated on the first pass?
> >>>
> >>> I know that David will soon be getting to me with advice on the
> >>> second
> >>> question - and I do understand that everyone has been super busy
> >>> getting
> >>> the 2012 version ready for release ... () - but in the mean time, it
> >>> occurs to me that this must be a pretty common need, so I'd like
> >>> to put
> >>> it out there, in case anyone else has already worked out how to do
> >>> this?
> >>>
> >>> I am starting to fret very slightly!
> >>> Best wishes,
> >>> Menan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tshwanelex-l mailing list
> > Tshwanelex-l at mailman.yale.edu
> > http://mailman.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/tshwanelex-l
>
More information about the Tshwanelex-l
mailing list