[yul-naco] FW: RDA NACO records for review

[Arakawa, Steven]

Yes, all of the additional 3xx fields are OK to add to AACR2 NARs so after changing the Desc Cat code to c and removing rda from 040 it can be added to the NAF w/out LC review. The bib record can still be coded as rda, since you're following pcc policy for pre March 31.

http://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/rda/PCC%20Post%20RDA%20Test%20Guidelines.html


Do not create hybrid AACR2/RDA authorized access points in establishing new headings or in making additions to existing headings. Follow one cataloging code or the other in establishing authorized access points. Catalogers making additions to AACR2 headings or making new headings based on existing AACR2 records will use AACR2 rules and appropriate LCRIs.  Catalogers making additions to RDA headings or making new headings based on existing RDA records will use RDA instructions.



Also, for NACO catalogers, watch out for the required exception for Works in example 5. As far as I can tell, it only applies to Works and not to specific forms.
Steven Arakawa
Catalog Librarian for Training & Documentation
Catalog & Metadata Services, SML, Yale University
P.O. Box 208240 New Haven, CT 06520-8240
(203)432-8286 steven.arakawa at yale.edu

From: yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu [mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Heiman, Larry
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 8:23 AM
To: Distribution list for YUL NACO catalogers
Subject: Re: [yul-naco] FW: RDA NACO records for review

Then I should probably withdraw no. 56 from review, which I sent out yesterday, and just produce?

From: yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu [mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Arakawa, Steven
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 5:15 PM
To: yul-naco at mailman.yale.edu
Subject: [yul-naco] FW: RDA NACO records for review

It just occurred to me that Germany. Bundestag is AACR2; so the new record has to be coded as AACR2 as well. Since the RDA rules for subordinate government bodies and subdivisions haven't changed from AACR2, the 2 RDA rules cited still apply, but the authority record needs to be coded as AACR2 & can't go in the RDA queue.

Steven Arakawa
Catalog Librarian for Training & Documentation
Catalog & Metadata Services, SML, Yale University
P.O. Box 208240 New Haven, CT 06520-8240
(203)432-8286 steven.arakawa at yale.edu<mailto:steven.arakawa at yale.edu>

From: yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu<mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu> [mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu]<mailto:[mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu]> On Behalf Of Arakawa, Steven
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 4:45 PM
To: Distribution list for YUL NACO catalogers
Subject: Re: [yul-naco] RDA NACO records for review

The application has been inconsistent for sure. But I think the rules I cited apply.

Steven Arakawa
Catalog Librarian for Training & Documentation
Catalog & Metadata Services, SML, Yale University
P.O. Box 208240 New Haven, CT 06520-8240
(203)432-8286 steven.arakawa at yale.edu<mailto:steven.arakawa at yale.edu>

From: yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu<mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu> [mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu]<mailto:[mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu]> On Behalf Of Griem, Rowena
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 4:07 PM
To: Distribution list for YUL NACO catalogers
Subject: Re: [yul-naco] RDA NACO records for review

I created #55 based on numerous examples of authority records for "Germany. Bundestag. Enquete-Kommission...", including at least one created by LC.
Rowena

On Aug 9, 2012, at 3:02 PM, "Arakawa, Steven" <steven.arakawa at yale.edu<mailto:steven.arakawa at yale.edu>> wrote:


Steven Arakawa
Catalog Librarian for Training & Documentation
Catalog & Metadata Services, SML, Yale University
P.O. Box 208240 New Haven, CT 06520-8240
(203)432-8286 steven.arakawa at yale.edu<mailto:steven.arakawa at yale.edu>

From: yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu<mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu> [mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu]<mailto:[mailto:yul-naco-bounces at mailman.yale.edu]> On Behalf Of Griem, Rowena
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 6:05 PM
To: yul-naco at mailman.yale.edu<mailto:yul-naco at mailman.yale.edu>
Subject: [yul-naco] RDA NACO records for review

55.          Germany. Bundestag. Enquete-Kommission "Nachhaltige Engergieversorgung unter den Bedingungen der Globalisierung und der Liberalisierung"
[Steven Arakawa]This falls into RDA 11.2.2.19, Type 2. (includes term implying administrative e subordination: Kommission). Following 11.2.2.20, establish without "Bundestag" and make a reference from Germany. Bundestag.  I would also make a reference from the Enquete-Kommission.

3.            Sanden, Gabriel,  1885-1933 [Steven Arakawa]  I was going to suggest establishing the pseudonym, but your citations back up the Charlotte Bronte rule--all reference sources consulted enter under Sanden, ergo the Sanden name is "best known under" which trumps the usage in this case. I think the LCPS not to qualify with the fuller form unless there is a conflict [9.19.1.4] would apply to references as well as the established form.

________________________________________

YUL-NACO Archives: http://mailman.yale.edu/pipermail/yul-naco/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.yale.edu/pipermail/yul-naco/attachments/20120810/e1be988a/attachment-0001.html