[EAS]Computer Desktop Interfaces
peter.kindlmann at yale.edu
Tue Jan 16 18:18:29 EST 2001
Mail*Link® SMTP Computer Desktop Interfaces
Monday, January 15, 2001
Modern Operating System, Interface Are Ripe for Change
By Gary Chapman
Copyright 2001, The Los Angeles Times, All Rights Reserved
One safe technology prediction for this year is that we'll see new
operating systems and new user interfaces on personal computers. Mac
OS X (referred to as "10"), Microsoft's code-named "Whistler" update
to Windows and Eazel Corp.'s new user interface for Linux are all
expected to debut in 2001.
Many people are eagerly awaiting these products, and some analysts
are hoping they'll deliver a much-needed jolt to the personal
computer industry. But other experts think that the modern PC
operating system is stuck in a rut, and that a breakthrough in PC
interface design will come from some unknown firm.
Still, there is no doubt that one of the most amazing technological
phenomena of the last 20 years has been the universal adoption of the
desktop graphical user interface, or GUI, pronounced "gooey" by
technical developers. Almost anywhere in the world, you will find a
PC using some variation of this interface. Most computer users have
never used anything else. Although there remain some hard-core
adherents of the old text-based, command-line interface, the majority
of computer users rely on what software designers call the WIMP
factor -- windows, icons, menus and a pointing device, usually a
The desktop user interface is about 25 years old and was developed
principally at Xerox's Palo Alto Research Center. Apple Computer's
Steve Jobs toured the Xerox PARC labs and shortly after, many of
Xerox's innovations showed up in the Apple Lisa and then the
Macintosh. After a few shaky starts, Microsoft eventually absorbed
the desktop concept into Windows. Now the basic elements of the
desktop user interface are so familiar that they seem as permanent
and stable as the automobile's dashboard-steering wheel combination
of the automobile.
But some computer scientists and experts think that this desktop
system is living long past its usefulness, and because all three
major PC operating systems will be overhauled this year, we may have
an ideal opportunity to make a leap as significant as the Mac
interface was in 1984.
Indeed, the new, colorful and striking interface for Mac OS X is
different enough from the "classic" Mac system to require some
adjustment and training. Microsoft's Whistler promises some new
interface tweaks and Eazel's Nautilus desktop software will provide
an entirely new look to Linux.
Jef Raskin was the original project leader of the Macintosh
development effort at Apple, and he recently told me that he's "very
disappointed" because computer companies, and even the open-source
crowd, are getting hidebound and reactionary. "People are finally
beginning to realize that this interface that was developed back in
the '70s and '80s isn't really hacking it," Raskin said, but there's
"no revolutionary fervor anymore."
"Mac OS X is sort of window dressing. Its changes are not very
interesting, and it's certainly not a new direction that people
should be looking for," Raskin said. He said the work of Eazel, a
company that includes some of his former colleagues from Apple, "is
the same old thing again."
There's been a rising tide of criticism among technical innovators
about the shortcomings of the desktop design for PC interfaces. As
Raskin says in his book, "The Humane Interface" (Addison-Wesley,
2000), the desktop concept was developed when computers were used
almost exclusively for business -- hence the attempt to simulate a
work desk. It was also a time when computer memory was scarce,
screens were small, processors were slow and files were few in number
and all local, or stored on the computer being used. Yale University
computer scientist David Gelernter, another desktop system critic,
said, "We need an interface designed to cope with what people do with
computers now, instead of what they did with computers in 1977."
Raskin also points out that the desktop user design is weighted
toward the "learning phase" of computer use. It's a simulation of a
desk-like work space, with folders, file cabinets, a trash can, etc.,
in order to "cue" new users about the computer's functions.
But once people learn this simulated environment, the learning cues
actually impede efficient use of the computer. PCs show little of
what could be an "automatic phase" of computer use, Raskin said.
Users spend too much time organizing files, looking for files,
creating folders, deleting files, emptying the trash, etc. -- all
functions left over from noncomputerized office work that persist on
computers. Many of these tasks could be, and should be, automated,
Gelernter agrees, saying, "New user interfaces will get rid of
directories and the file clerk model of computing."
Moreover, we now use computers much differently from what the
original desktop designers envisioned, such as for entertainment,
audio and video, spoken commands, and, of course, cruising the
Internet. Individual users commonly have thousands of files on their
computers and access to billions more on the Internet. Their "view"
through the flat screen window, however, is still typically the
single document or file on the screen, a metaphor appropriate to a
single printed page, and not to the myriad ways we use this global
universe of networked, multimedia information now readily at hand.
Raskin has experimented with spatial user designs that he compares to
flying an airplane over a landscape, a "plane" that can dive down
into greater and greater detail, or ascend into abstraction, with
clicks of the mouse. Gelernter and his company, Mirror Worlds
(http://www.mirrorworlds.com), have explored a chronological scheme,
using the metaphor of a diary or a "lifestream."
Gelernter also said, "It's clear that the user interface will move to
depth, instead of the two-dimensional plane we have today. The
interface will become a deep, 3-D landscape, unrelated to the paper
world." Mirror Worlds is set to announce a new software product with
a new concept for personal computing this month.
Raskin said, "The world is ripe for a change. People are very annoyed
with computers. The Macintosh used to be insanely great; now it's
insanely complicated." Gelernter added that when things change and we
ditch the desktop, "It's not going to come from any of the
established companies -- it will be from a company you've never heard
Gary Chapman is director of the 21st Century Project at the
University of Texas at Austin. He can be reached at
gary.chapman at mail.utexas.edu.
To subscribe to a listserv that forwards copies of Gary Chapman's
published articles, including his column "Digital Nation" in The Los
Angeles Times, send mail to:
listproc at lists.cc.utexas.edu
Leave the subject line blank. In the first line of the message, put:
Subscribe Chapman [First name] [Last name]
Leave out the brackets, just put your name after Chapman.
Send this message.
You'll get a confirmation message back confirming your subscription.
This message will contain some boilerplate text, generated by the
listserv software, about passwords, which you should IGNORE.
Passwords will not be used or required for this listserv.
Mail volume on this listserv is low; expect to get something two or
three times a month. The list will be used only for forwarding
published versions of Gary Chapman's articles, or else pointers to
URLs for online versions of his articles -- nothing else will be sent
to the list.
To unsubscribe from the listserv, follow the same instructions above,
except substitute the word "Unsubscribe" for "Subscribe."
Please feel free to pass along copies of the forwarded articles, but
please retain the relevant copyright information. Also feel free to
pass along these instructions for subscribing to the listserv, to
anyone who might be interested in such material.
Questions should be directed to Gary Chapman at gary.chapman at mail.utexas.edu.
More information about the EAS-INFO