[EAS] Classes as Tupperware Parties

Peter J. Kindlmann peter.kindlmann at yale.edu
Fri Jun 18 15:28:47 EDT 2010

Favorite quote:

>Barr said that he thinks the real problem is that professors are 
>over-relying on their PowerPoints, and are losing the art of 
>improvisation. A good faculty member, he said, must be like a good 
>comedian - "knowing the audience, responding to the audience" and 
>either extending one line of thought or regrouping when something 
>hasn't worked.


From: tomorrows-professor-request at mailman.stanford.edu
Subject: tomorrows-professor Digest, Vol 45, Issue 6
To: tomorrows-professor at mailman.stanford.edu
Reply-To: tomorrows-professor at mailman.stanford.edu
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:00:05 -0700
X-BeenThere: tomorrows-professor at lists.stanford.edu
List-Id: <tomorrows-professor.lists.stanford.edu>
	<mailto:tomorrows-professor-request at lists.stanford.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tomorrows-professor at lists.stanford.edu>
List-Help: <mailto:tomorrows-professor-request at lists.stanford.edu?subject=help>
	<mailto:tomorrows-professor-request at lists.stanford.edu?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tomorrows-professor-bounces at mailman.stanford.edu
X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed)
X-Yale-Not-Spam: For more info see: http://www.yale.edu/email/spam/content.html
X-Yale-Spam-Score:  (0.55)
X-Yale-Filter-Score: 0.55

Send tomorrows-professor mailing list submissions to
	tomorrows-professor at lists.stanford.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	tomorrows-professor-request at lists.stanford.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
	tomorrows-professor-owner at lists.stanford.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re:
Contents of tomorrows-professor digest..."

Today's Topics:

     1. TP Msg. #1034 Lost Arts of Teaching (Rick Reis)


Message: 1
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:24:59 -0700
From: Rick Reis <reis at stanford.edu>
To: tomorrows-professor at lists.stanford.edu
Subject: TP Msg. #1034 Lost Arts of Teaching
Message-ID: <p06240800c841402a3d6a@[]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

They said they feel that many sessions for faculty members about the use of
technology are the equivalent of "Tupperware parties," focused on convenience
and not education.
                                          TOMORROW'S PROFESSOR(sm) eMAIL


Sponsored by
                                               Stanford Center for Teaching and


Posting comments



The posting below by Scott Jaschik, raises some interesting issues about the
value of technology tools in teaching and learning. It is from the June 2, 2010
issue of INSIDE HIGHER ED, an excellent - and free - online source for news,
opinion and jobs for all of higher education.  You can subscribe by going to:
http://insidehighered.com/.  Also for a free daily update from Inside Higher 
Ed, e-mail [scott.jaschik at insidehighered.com]. Copyright ?
2010 Inside Higher Ed. Reprinted with permission.


Rick Reis
reis at stanford.edu
UP NEXT: Are Women Better PIs?

                                                     Tomorrow's Teaching and

       ----------------------------------------- 1,016 words

                                                              Lost Arts of

AUSTIN, TEX. -- Anthony Pitucco, chair of physics at Pima Community College,
apologized to his audience here on Tuesday at the annual meeting of the National
Institute for Staff and Organizational Development. He had asked, he said, for
"a more advanced room" at the convention center, but there were no rooms
available with the technology he wanted: a chalkboard, chalk and eraser. He
asked for a whiteboard and markers. Nothing was possible. Forced to make do with
"lesser technology," he had to use PowerPoint, which, for various reasons he
elaborated on, he considers inferior to chalk and a board.

Pitucco -- along with his Pima colleague and fellow presenter, Stewart Barr,
chair of philosophy -- aren't Luddites. They can produce a PowerPoint when they
have to. But they argued in an unusual session at this gathering of community
college educators that the push to use technology in the classroom has
diminished the roles of teaching and education. They said they feel that many
sessions for faculty members about the use of technology are the equivalent of
"Tupperware parties," focused on convenience and not education.

The NISOD meeting features numerous sessions about technology, and the exhibit
hall is full of companies anxious to explain how to use clickers in new ways and
how various technologies can help faculty members do their jobs better. In fact,
several sessions focused not on debating the value of technology, but on how to
persuade dubious faculty members to embrace technological advances. Easily the
best-named session of the conference was "We Can't Give Enemas Online
-- Strategies for Moving Nursing Faculty to Online Programming."

But the presentation by the Pima professors was defiantly against the grain, and
audience members appeared to welcome the change, nodding and chuckling at the
critique that was offered. Audience members weren't Luddites, either. When they
were asked in the presentation to cite examples of technologies that improved
learning, they cited a number. One faculty member mentioned that plagiarism
detection software (combined with instruction) had significantly reduced
plagiarism at his institution. Another praised MyMathLab (a Pearson
product) for speeding students through remedial math. Attendees in
career-oriented fields mentioned how simulation technology helps teach community
college students to mix drinks (in hospitality
programs) and to perform some medical procedures (in nursing programs).

The concern about technology (in its entirety, rather than one tool or another)
was summed up in a series of statistics reviewed by both professors showing that
increasing numbers of college students are not prepared for work at the college
level. At that point, the presenters asked: If technology is helping us teach
better, why are we seeing so much evidence that students aren't learning as well
as we would like? Current college students have had more exposure to technology
in high school and college than previous generations did, but are they better
off for it?

Pitucco stressed that he was not arguing that technology is the cause of
educational failings. But he said that -- given that technology costs money and
takes time to learn -- shouldn't more questions be asked about whether the
entire emphasis on technology has helped enough to justify its continued use?

"There is a science and an art to teaching," he said. And if technology is part
of the science, it's time to focus anew on the art. Audience members traded
stories about colleagues back home who
-- on a day that technology in their classrooms wasn't working to allow for
PowerPoints or other tools -- canceled class because they didn't know what to

Others talked about how seemingly forward-thinking ideas, like the "hybrid"
course that mixes in-person and online instruction, can backfire. One faculty
member spoke about how, at her campus, students sign up for the courses with no
idea what they really are - sometimes unaware that they still must attend class
and others not understanding how to work online. "It's been a real disaster,"
she said.

There was no real manifesto issued at the session, but there were repeated calls
to take back the classroom.

Barr talked about his revelation last year that he could ban students from using
laptops or cell phones during class. He said he immediately saw the quality of
discussion in class go up. Faculty members may think, as he did originally, that
since they would have used laptops for note-taking (if they had had them as
students), that's how they would be used today -- and not realize all the
Facebook action and messaging and surfing that's really going on.

Telling students that cell phones must be turned off, he said, requires firmness
on the professor's part. He demonstrated the looks he sees on some students as
they are constantly glancing down on their muted but decidedly not off cells,
anxious about any texts they may have missed. Barr said he isn't heartless on
the matter and that he has been known to tell some students "go outside and get
your fix.
You are in too much pain" from not being able to use the cell. But they must
leave to do so.

And the professors said faculty members also need to be more questioning about
whether PowerPoints are really the best way to communicate with students.
Pitucco said that he believes that they may work well in some cases, but said
that "when you are lecturing, you are unfolding ideas, and on the screen you
have an immediate snapshot."

He said he finds that the act of writing on a board more accurately conveys the
path he is taking an idea.

Barr said that he thinks the real problem is that professors are over-relying on
their PowerPoints, and are losing the art of improvisation. A good faculty
member, he said, must be like a good comedian - "knowing the audience,
responding to the audience" and either extending one line of thought or
regrouping when something hasn't worked.

Faculty members who base their classes on PowerPoint, he said, seem to lose that
flexibility, which he said was crucial to reaching students. "Just because your
machine tells you to go, you go."

*       *       *       *       *       *       *
NOTE: Anyone can SUBSCRIBE to the Tomorrows-Professor Mailing List by going to:


tomorrows-professor mailing list
tomorrows-professor at lists.stanford.edu

End of tomorrows-professor Digest, Vol 45, Issue 6

More information about the EAS-INFO mailing list