Creation of newsgroup uk.rec.lepidoptera
Chris Raper
triocomp at dial.pipex.com
Tue Nov 24 12:03:09 EST 1998
On Tue, 24 Nov 1998 15:53:52 +0000, ian john waller
<ian at ijwaller.demon.co.uk> wrote:
Hi Ian
>I think I am active in the lepidoptera scene in the northeast, but I
>have only been a sparodic poster to the leps-list because I have felt
>slightly uneasy about posting some news items
Certainly, sometimes I think I am guilty of that one. But in general I
think that the general volume of postings suggests that we should be a
little less restrained sometimes - some regular contributors to other
groups seem to post stuff that has little or no relevance - but it is
tollerated and creates good discussion.
>Examples would be the return to the northeast of the holly blue
>or, someone who rang E.N. saying they had a dead speckled wood
>or, the finding of cinnabar (Tyria jacobaeae) larvae in Hamsterley
>Forest, the first for Co. Durham since 1956.
I understand and ackowledge your point but I would say that neither of
these cases would have prevented me from posting the information to
s.b.e.l. :-)
As long as the subject header clearly states 'UK' in it, I can't see
that American or European readers are going to object. Very often (but
don't ask me to quote examples) a discussion is started on this side
of the pond about a UK lep which has been added to by a non-UK
benefiting everyone.
>If the general consensus is that news such is this is relevant to a
>global audience, then I am happy to accept this.
Try it and see :-)
>But, at the minute I feel these items are extremley small fish in a big
>ocean.
Go on - post.
If someone complains then we can think about creating this new group
but until there is a concensus of opinion in s.b.e.l that too many UK
posts are irrelevant I would assume that a) readers are happy to read
about our leps or b) they have kill-filtered me long ago! :-)
Cheers
Chris R.
More information about the Leps-l
mailing list