I'm in trouble
Paul C Weaver
beavis5 at utkux.utcc.utk.edu
Tue Sep 15 09:33:49 EDT 1998
I would like to make some comments on this subject.
This news group has to deal with Lepidoptera in a professional
scholastic and an amateur enthusist manner. I can't see why one would not
be able to advertise livestock or dried specimens on the leps list since
this crosses both areas. I personally have made many good and lasting
friendships with people who breed lepidoptera. The only reason I was able
to meet them was because they advertised at least once on this
list. Again I feel that the by-laws of the news group were to keep out
nonrelated subject material (SPAM) not to prohibit the advertisement of
Lepidoptera for study and enjoyment.
If you still don't agree try rearing some leps from another area of
the country. IF you still disagree then you do have a delete button.
However, don't repress the freedom of this news group to share knowledge
and information via live or dried specimens.
On Mon, 14 Sep 1998, Chris Raper wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 1998 08:08:03 -0700, "Anthony W. Cynor"
> <acynor at fullerton.edu> wrote:
> >Does this Roger Kendrick have an e-mail and it should be published. I find it
> >odd that it would not be broadcast to everyone if it was a violation. Many have
> >advertised this before so has anyone else got this?
> Hi Tony,
> I have no idea about the contents of the original email that Barrie
> says he got from Roger but I know Roger Kendrick pretty well and I can
> only assume that he was (politely) reminding Barrie that most
> newsgroups have a no-advertising law in their charter.
> I for one don't like to see advertising of any sort in usenet postings
> - and by the sound of it, neither does Roger :-)
> Best wishes,
> Chris R.
More information about the Leps-l