more on species
warrena at bcc.orst.edu
warrena at bcc.orst.edu
Tue Nov 27 13:43:25 EST 2001
Thanks to Chris Durden for a different perspective!
Chris starts by providing various definitions for
species (a good idea!), and clearly illustrates
that "species" has different meanings in the worlds of
geology and biology. "Species" in geology
and "species" in biology are similar only in that they
they are a "kind"; beyond this the similarities fade.
Asexual organisms are only considered to be species
under some species concepts (they are usually called
lineages under species concepts that don't recognize
asexual "species."). This is a minor point, but
illustrates how different species concepts view the
terminology in different ways.
Chris demonstrates that "subspecies" in mammals are not
equivalent to subspecies in corals or subspecies in
butterflies (must be allopatric in mammals but can can
have narrow zones of overlap in insects and broad zones
of overlap in corals).
So if the species (subspecies) problem is so simple,
why is there no standard definition of subspecies that
can be applied to species in these different groups?
Having one group of animals where subspecies are
allopatric populations, but having another where
subspecies meet and blend is not a simple solution to
the problem (how about bacteria, viruses, plants?).
Note that the use of niches as characters we can use to
define species or subspecies is linked to a certain
species concept (they would be irrelevant to some
species concepts).
The real problem seems to be exactly how to describe
and communicate geographical variation. Everyone
agrees on the use of species, but that is where the
agreement ends. I don't claim to have the answers but
hope these posts cause us to think about this and
evaluate how we deal with this in our everyday lives...
I recently read about several salamanders that exist as
asexual lineages but are placed in genera with sexually
reproducing species (like Ambystoma jeffersonianum-
apparently a product of a hybridization event;
reproductive females mate with A. platineum but the
sperm does not fertilize the egg- it only stimulates
egg development). It is in cases like this, in my
opinion, that challenge species concepts and force us
to take a philosophical look at the meaning
of "species" in the biological sense.
Andy
------------------------------------------------------------
For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
More information about the Leps-l
mailing list