Polites origenes or P. themistocles?
Michael Gochfeld
gochfeld at eohsi.rutgers.edu
Tue Oct 30 21:56:06 EST 2001
I vote for P.themistocles (Tawny-edged) for number 2.
The unmarked hindwing and the strong tawny bar on the FW seem indicative.
In life there is a "jizz" to the Tawny-edged that's hard to explain (jizzes are
by nature hard to describe).
I'll abstain on the first photo. The slightly dotted pattern on the ventral
hindwing can occur in
Tawny-edged although I can't recall feeling confident identifhying of that
variation here in NJ.
It is more typical of P. origines. Likewise the not-so-strong tawny bar on the
forewing in a creature that's
not especially worn, doesn't strike me as P.themistocles.
So if I had voted on both I would have reached the opposite conclusion from
Chris.
Of course there may be different variation patterns between NJ, NC and TX.
If I understood Chris correctly, the three subapical spots on the dorsal FWof
the first individual shows that the outermost spot is
longer than the other two. Is this a significant mark for P.themistocles? It
shows up in some books but not others and doesn't seems consistent.
Of course, there's always a chance that book photos are mis-identified.
------------------------------------------------------------
For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
More information about the Leps-l
mailing list